Theoretical vs. empirical discriminability: the application of ROC methods to eyewitness identification

作者: John T. Wixted , Laura Mickes

DOI: 10.1186/S41235-018-0093-8

关键词: Field (computer science)Cognitive psychologyExperimental psychologyReceiver operating characteristicArea under the roc curveComputer scienceConfusionEyewitness identificationMeasure (mathematics)

摘要: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was introduced to the field of eyewitness identification 5 years ago. Since that time, it has been both influential and controversial, debate raised an issue about measuring discriminability is rarely considered. The concerns distinction between empirical (measured by area under ROC curve) vs. underlying/theoretical d’ or variants it). Under most circumstances, two measures will agree a difference conditions in terms discriminability. However, possible for them disagree, fact can lead confusion which condition actually yields higher For example, if have implications real-world practice (e.g., comparison competing lineup formats), should policymaker rely on area-under-the-curve measure theory-based measure? Here, we illustrate given as many underlying there are theories one willing take seriously. No matter theory correct, practical purposes, singular best identifies diagnostically superior procedure. reason, curve informs policy way theoretical never can. At same equally important, but different reason. Without adequate understanding relevant task, be no position enhance

参考文章(48)
Gary L. Wells, Andrew M. Smith, Laura Smalarz, ROC analysis of lineups obscures information that is critical for both theoretical understanding and applied purposes Journal of applied research in memory and cognition. ,vol. 4, pp. 324- 328 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.JARMAC.2015.08.010
Stuart J. Starr, Charles E. Metz, Lee B. Lusted, David J. Goodenough, Visual Detection and Localization of Radiographic Images Radiology. ,vol. 116, pp. 533- 538 ,(1975) , 10.1148/116.3.533
Debbie S. Ma, Joshua Correll, Bernd Wittenbrink, The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data Behavior Research Methods. ,vol. 47, pp. 1122- 1135 ,(2015) , 10.3758/S13428-014-0532-5
L. W. Nolte, David Jaarsma, More on the Detection of One of M Orthogonal Signals Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. ,vol. 41, pp. 497- 505 ,(1967) , 10.1121/1.1910360
Wayne A. Wickelgren, Donald A. Norman, Strength models and serial position in short-term recognition memory ☆ Journal of Mathematical Psychology. ,vol. 3, pp. 316- 347 ,(1966) , 10.1016/0022-2496(66)90018-6
Miguel P. Eckstein, James P. Thomas, John Palmer, Steven S. Shimozaki, A signal detection model predicts the effects of set size on visual search accuracy for feature, conjunction, triple conjunction, and disjunction displays. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. ,vol. 62, pp. 425- 451 ,(2000) , 10.3758/BF03212096
John Palmer, Preeti Verghese, Misha Pavel, The psychophysics of visual search. Vision Research. ,vol. 40, pp. 1227- 1268 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00244-8
Richard G. Swensson, Philip F. Judy, Detection of noisy visual targets: Models for the effects of spatial uncertainty and signal-to-noise ratio Perception & Psychophysics. ,vol. 29, pp. 521- 534 ,(1981) , 10.3758/BF03207369
Shannon M. Andersen, Curt A. Carlson, Maria A. Carlson, Scott D. Gronlund, Individual differences predict eyewitness identification performance Personality and Individual Differences. ,vol. 60, pp. 36- 40 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.PAID.2013.12.011