Genetic correlations between live yearling bull and steer carcass traits adjusted to different slaughter end points. 2. Carcass fat partitioning.

作者: R. Bergen , S. P. Miller , J. W. Wilton , D. H. Crews , I. B. Mandell

DOI: 10.2527/2006.843546X

关键词: Marbled meatAnimal scienceEnd pointSlaughter ageBiologyAnatomyUltrasonography

摘要: We studied genetic relationships between age-constant live yearling beef bull growth and ultrasound traits steer carcass with dissected lean percentage adjusted to slaughter age-, HCW-, fat depth-, marbling score-constant end points. Three measures of were used. Blue Tag (BTLean) was predicted from HCW, depth, LM area measurements. Ruler (RulerLean) depth width Dissected (DissLean) based on dissection the 10-11-12th rib section. Both BTLean (h2 = 0.30 0.44) DissLean 0.34 0.39) more heritable than RulerLean 0.05 0.14) at all Genetic correlations among (rg 0.61 0.70), 0.56 0.72), 0.59 0.90) indicated that these not genetically identical. Adjusting Diss-Lean different points changed magnitude, but generally direction, indicator traits. Ultrasound scan-age-constant estimates 0.26 0.42) correlated each other 0.68 0.99) had greater age 0.24 0.48) HCW 0.16 0.40) -0.08 0.13) score 0.02 0.11) Scan-age-constant also stronger -0.34) -0.25) -0.02) -0.03) Yearling positively endpoints 0.11 0.23). method 1 0.38 0.56) 2 -0.17 -0.38) measurements suggested shape may be a valuable addition improvement programs for age, constant At points, -0.60 -0.64) 0.48 0.59) associations did corresponding Improved methods combine would beneficial evaluating or

参考文章(42)
B C Shanks, M W Tess, D D Kress, B E Cunningham, Genetic evaluation of carcass traits in Simmental-sired cattle at different slaughter end points. Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 79, pp. 595- 604 ,(2001) , 10.2527/2001.793595X
I. B. Mandell, J. W. Wilton, C. J. B. Devitt, T. L. Fernandes, Genetic parameter estimates for meat quality traits in beef cattle managed under a constant finishing program. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Montpellier, France, August, 2002. Session 2.. pp. 0- 4 ,(2002)
D. M. Marshall, Breed differences and genetic parameters for body composition traits in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 72, pp. 2745- 2755 ,(1994) , 10.2527/1994.72102745X
H C Block, J J McKinnon, A F Mustafa, D A Christensen, Manipulation of cattle growth to target carcass quality. Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 79, pp. 133- 140 ,(2001) , 10.2527/2001.791133X
M E Dikeman, L V Cundiff, K E Gregory, K E Kemp, R M Koch, Relative contributions of subcutaneous and intermuscular fat to yields and predictability of retail product, fat trim, and bone in beef carcasses. Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 76, pp. 1604- 1612 ,(1998) , 10.2527/1998.7661604X
David J. Johnston, John M. Thompson, Keith Hammond, Additive and nonadditive differences in postweaning growth and carcass characteristics of Devon, Hereford, and reciprocal-cross steers. Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 70, pp. 2688- 2694 ,(1992) , 10.2527/1992.7092688X
R. M. Koch, M. E. Dikeman, D. M. Allen, M. May, J. D. Crouse, D. R. Campion, Characterization of Biological Types of Cattle (Cycle III).III. Carcass Composition, Quality and Palatability Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 43, pp. 48- 62 ,(1976) , 10.2527/JAS1976.43148X
D. H. Crews, E. J. Pollak, R. L. Weaber, R. L. Quaas, R. J. Lipsey, Genetic parameters for carcass traits and their live animal indicators in Simmental cattle. Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 81, pp. 1427- 1433 ,(2003) , 10.2527/2003.8161427X