Pediatric eMental healthcare technologies: a systematic review of implementation foci in research studies, and government and organizational documents.

摘要: Researchers, healthcare planners, and policymakers convey a sense of urgency in using eMental technologies to improve pediatric mental availability access. Yet, different stakeholders may focus on aspects implementation. We conducted systematic review identify implementation foci research studies government/organizational documents for healthcare. A search eleven electronic databases grey literature was conducted. included from organization government websites if the technology children/adolescents (0–18 years), studied reported (research studies) or goals/recommendations regarding were made (documents). assessed study quality Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool document Guidelines Research & Evaluation II. Implementation information grouped according Proctor colleagues’ outcomes—acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, cost, feasibility, fidelity, penetration, sustainability—and separately documents. Twenty nine met eligibility criteria. These articles represented USA (14 studies), United Kingdom (2 documents, 3 Canada 1 study), Australia (4 New Zealand (1 Netherlands document). The excellent (n = 11), good (n = 6), poor (n = 1). health focused acceptability (70%, n = 14) appropriateness (50%, n = 10) users professionals. organizational high (n = 2), medium low cost (100%, n = 9), penetration (89%, n = 8), feasibility (78%, n = 7), sustainability (67%, n = 6) implementing technology. To date, have largely while state goals recommendations costs, technologies. differences suggest that evidence available does not reflect governments organizations. Partnerships between researchers, help align with policy development, decision-making, funding foci.