Comparing Choice Question Formats for Evaluating Natural Resource Tradeoffs
作者： William S. Breffle , Robert D. Rowe
DOI: 10.2307/3147275
关键词: Randomness 、 Variance (accounting) 、 Estimation 、 Natural resource 、 Scope (project management) 、 Scale (social sciences) 、 Coherence (statistics) 、 Econometrics 、 Task (project management) 、 Computer science
摘要: Choice questions are increasingly being used to scale competing natural resource programs. Respondents choose between two alternatives with varying levels of program characteristics and costs. Complexity in the choice task can increase randomness (variance) choices estimation preferences, magnitude is examined using scope tests parameters. We provide an empirical comparison response variance from three formats. A simple resource-to-resource format appears superior referendum composite formats terms coherence. The application stems a study addressing PCBcaused losses Green Bay, Wisconsin.
uwpress.org
jstor.org
sci-hub.se 参考文章(10)
James J. Opaluch, Marisa J. Mazzotta, Decision Making When Choices Are Complex: A Test of Heiner's Hypothesis Land Economics. ,vol. 71, pp. 500- 515 ,(1995)
Richard T. Carson, Contingent Valuation Surveys and Tests of Insensitivity to Scope Determining the Value of Non-Marketed Goods. pp. 127- 163 ,(1997) , 10.1007/978-94-011-5364-5_6
Charles F. Manski, Kenneth I. Wolpin, Elke U. Weber, Analysis of Choice Expectations in Incomplete Scenarios Elicitation of Preferences. ,vol. 19, pp. 49- 72 ,(1999) , 10.1007/978-94-017-1406-8_3
Joffre Swait, Wiktor Adamowicz, Choice Environment, Market Complexity, and Consumer Behavior: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach for Incorporating Decision Complexity into Models of Consumer Choice Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. ,vol. 86, pp. 141- 167 ,(2001) , 10.1006/OBHD.2000.2941
David A. Hensher, Stated preference analysis of travel choices: the state of practice Transportation. ,vol. 21, pp. 107- 133 ,(1994) , 10.1007/BF01098788
MICHAEL Williams, W Adamowicz, P Boxall, M Williams, J Louviere, Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation American Journal of Agricultural Economics. ,vol. 80, pp. 64- 75 ,(1998) , 10.2307/3180269
Richard T. Carson, Jordan J. Louviere, Donald A. Anderson, Phipps Arabie, David S. Bunch, David A. Hensher, Richard M. Johnson, Warren F. Kuhfeld, Dan Steinberg, Joffre Swait, Harry Timmermans, James B. Wiley, Experimental analysis of choice Marketing Letters. ,vol. 5, pp. 351- 367 ,(1991) , 10.1007/BF00999210
Paul E. Green, V. Srinivasan, Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice: Journal of Marketing. ,vol. 54, pp. 3- 19 ,(1990) , 10.1177/002224299005400402
W Kip Viscusi, Wesley A Magat, Joel Huber, Pricing environmental health risks: survey assessments of risk-risk and risk-dollar trade-offs for chronic bronchitis☆ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. ,vol. 21, pp. 32- 51 ,(1991) , 10.1016/0095-0696(91)90003-2
Richard T. Carson, Nicholas E. Flores, Norman F. Meade, Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence Environmental and Resource Economics. ,vol. 19, pp. 173- 210 ,(2001) , 10.1023/A:1011128332243