DOI: 10.1080/14649880701462213
关键词: Freedom of movement 、 Law 、 Social status 、 Deontic logic 、 Interpretation (philosophy) 、 Social background 、 Sociology 、 Epistemology 、 Outcome (game theory)
摘要: Martha Nussbaum has recently argued that “the language of capabilities … gives important precision and supplementation to the rights.” This claim raises question whether idea capabilities, as she or Amartya Sen developed it, provides a basis for capturing deriving basic liberties such liberty employment freedom movement. In this essay, I argue is not useful in way, because it cannot well capture social, institutional, deontic aspects liberties. Sen's interpretation capability particularly limited regard, on account its incorporation dispositive (the someone's free choice will determine an outcome). While Nussbaum's lacks limitation, way modeling kind guaranteed social status which consist.