Mimicry and Investigative Interviewing: Using Deliberate Mimicry to Elicit Information and Cues to Deceit

作者: Dominic J. Shaw , Aldert Vrij , Sharon Leal , Samantha Mann , Jackie Hillman

DOI: 10.1002/JIP.1438

关键词: MimicryInterviewPsychologyDeceptionSocial psychologyCompliance (psychology)

摘要: We examined the effect of deliberate mimicry on eliciting (accurate) information and cues to deceit. Mimicry is considered facilitate cooperation compliance in truth tellers, whereas liars are constrained provide detail. therefore expected tellers be more detailed than liars, particularly after being mimicked. A total 165 participants told or lied about a meeting they attended. During interview, an interviewer mimicked half participants. Truth were but only ‘mimicry present’ condition. also gave accurate units difference was most pronounced as tool for deceit fits well with emerging ‘interviewing detect deception’ literature, ‘encouraging interviewees say more’ approach.

参考文章(45)
Pär Anders Granhag, Leif A. Strömwall, Rebecca M. Willén, Maria Hartwig, Eliciting cues to deception by tactical disclosure of evidence: The first test of the Evidence Framing Matrix Legal and Criminological Psychology. ,vol. 18, pp. 341- 355 ,(2013) , 10.1111/J.2044-8333.2012.02047.X
Dave Walsh, Ray Bull, Benefit Fraud Investigative Interviewing: A Self-Report Study of Investigation Professionals' Beliefs Concerning Practice Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling. ,vol. 8, pp. 131- 148 ,(2011) , 10.1002/JIP.137
Samantha Mann, Aldert Vrij, Dominic J. Shaw, Sharon Leal, Sarah Ewens, Jackie Hillman, Par Anders Granhag, Ronald P. Fisher, Two heads are better than one? How to effectively use two interviewers to elicit cues to deception Legal and Criminological Psychology. ,vol. 18, pp. 324- 340 ,(2013) , 10.1111/J.2044-8333.2012.02055.X
Aldert Vrij, “We Will Protect Your Wife and Child, but Only If You Confess” Adversarial versus Inquisitorial Justice. pp. 55- 79 ,(2003) , 10.1007/978-1-4419-9196-6_4
Jessica L. Lakin, Valerie E. Jefferis, Clara Michelle Cheng, Tanya L. Chartrand, The Chameleon Effect as Social Glue: Evidence for the Evolutionary Significance of Nonconscious Mimicry Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. ,vol. 27, pp. 145- 162 ,(2003) , 10.1023/A:1025389814290
Brad E. Bell, Elizabeth F. Loftus, Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: the power of (a few) minor details. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 56, pp. 669- 679 ,(1989) , 10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.669
Jaume Masip, Siegfried L. Sporer, Eugenio Garrido, Carmen Herrero, The detection of deception with the reality monitoring approach: a review of the empirical evidence Psychology Crime & Law. ,vol. 11, pp. 99- 122 ,(2005) , 10.1080/10683160410001726356
Jacqueline R. Evans, Stephen W. Michael, Christian A. Meissner, Susan E. Brandon, Validating a new assessment method for deception detection: Introducing a Psychologically Based Credibility Assessment Tool Journal of applied research in memory and cognition. ,vol. 2, pp. 33- 41 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.JARMAC.2013.02.002