History, Contemporary Outcomes, and Future of Penile Prostheses: A Review of the Literature

作者: Landon Trost , Wayne J.G. Hellstrom

DOI: 10.1002/SMRJ.8

关键词: Patient satisfactionAdditional researchProspective cohort studyPhysical therapySurgeryPeyronie's diseaseRisk groupsHydrophilic coatingErectile dysfunctionPenile prosthesisMedicine

摘要: Abstract Introduction Since their introduction, penile prostheses have consistently remained a superior treatment option for men with erectile dysfunction (ED) refractory to conservative measures. Ongoing enhancements prosthetic design, materials, and surgical techniques resulted in improved outcomes. Aim To review available literature on notable historical advancements improvements of the prosthesis, summarize contemporary outcomes recent devices, discuss possible future directions prosthesis. Methods A PubMed search was performed all articles published from 1960 present relating Priority given series 12 months follow‐up or greater, larger series, studies reporting more models. Main Outcome Measures included leading to, rates mechanical failures, infections, satisfaction prostheses. Results Penile undergone numerous since initial reports synthetic materials utilized 1950s. Among others, device include Parylene coating, Bioflex® material, Inhibizone TM antibacterial impregnation, hydrophilic lockout valves, easy release pump mechanisms, which reliability, reduced infection rates, and/or patient Contemporary 3‐piece report survival 81–94%, 68–89%, 57–76% at 5, 10, 15 years, respectively. Infection current devices are 1–2% first‐time, low‐risk populations, 2–3% higher risk groups, partner 92–100% 91–95%, Two‐piece malleable associated slightly reliability decreased satisfaction. Minimal data currently exist selected including Peyronie's disease corporal fibrosis. Conclusions excellent, long‐term remain gold‐standard ED. Additional research prospective utilizing objective measures standardized questionnaires is required. Trost L Hellstrom WJG. History, outcomes, prostheses: literature. Sex Med Rev 2013;1:150–163.

参考文章(99)
Gerald H. Jordan, Gary J. Alter, David A. Gilbert, Charles E. Horton, Charles J. Devine, Penile Prosthesis Implantation in Total Phalloplasty Journal of Urology. ,vol. 152, pp. 410- 414 ,(1994) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)32751-9
Udo Jonas, Günther H. Jacobi, Silicone-Silver Penile Prosthesis: Description, Operative Approach and Results The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 123, pp. 865- 867 ,(1980) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)56168-6
P Rigatti, F Montorsi, G Pizzini, A Miani, L Barbieri, T Maga, G Guazzoni, A Graziottin, AMS 700 CX inflatable penile implants for Peyronie's disease: functional results, morbidity and patient-partner satisfaction International Journal of Impotence Research. ,vol. 8, pp. 81- 86 ,(1996)
Peter R. Hinds, Steven K. Wilson, Hossein Sadeghi‐Nejad, Dilemmas of inflatable penile prosthesis revision surgery: what practices achieve the best outcomes and the lowest infection rates? (CME). The Journal of Sexual Medicine. ,vol. 9, pp. 2483- 2492 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1743-6109.2012.02932.X
Dana A. Ohl, Gerald Brock, David Ralph, William Bogache, LeRoy Jones, Ricardo Munarriz, Laurence Levine, Chad Ritenour, Prospective Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction, and Surgeon and Patient Trainer Assessment of the Coloplast Titan One Touch Release Three‐Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis The Journal of Sexual Medicine. ,vol. 9, pp. 2467- 2474 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1743-6109.2012.02819.X
Gerard D. Henry, Craig F. Donatucci, William Conners, Jason M. Greenfield, Culley C. Carson, Steven K. Wilson, John Delk, Aaron C. Lentz, Mario A. Cleves, Caroline J. Jennermann, Andrew C. Kramer, An Outcomes Analysis of over 200 Revision Surgeries for Penile Prosthesis Implantation: A Multicenter Study The Journal of Sexual Medicine. ,vol. 9, pp. 309- 315 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1743-6109.2011.02524.X
Gerard D. Henry, Mary Jo Brinkman, Susan Fields Mead, John R. Delk, Mario A. Cleves, Caroline Jennermann, Steven K. Wilson, Andrew C. Kramer, A survey of patients with inflatable penile prostheses: assessment of timing and frequency of intercourse and analysis of implant durability. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. ,vol. 9, pp. 1715- 1721 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1743-6109.2012.02729.X
Laurence A. Levine, Michael P. Hoeh, Review of Penile Prosthetic Reservoir: Complications and Presentation of a Modified Reservoir Placement Technique The Journal of Sexual Medicine. ,vol. 9, pp. 2759- 2769 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1743-6109.2012.02807.X