作者: Vinothini Padmanathan , Leonard Joseph , Roslizawati Nawawi
DOI: 10.1016/J.SHAW.2015.06.006
关键词: Population 、 Know-how 、 Focus group 、 Human factors and ergonomics 、 Applied psychology 、 Psychology 、 Data collection 、 Social media 、 Social psychology 、 Intervention (counseling) 、 Standardization
摘要: To the Editor, We read with great interest recently published article entitled “Use of Ergonomic Measures Related to Musculoskeletal Complaints among Construction Workers: A 2-year Follow-up Study” by Frings-Dresen et al [1]. intervention prevents work-related musculoskeletal injuries in workers. We compliment authors for their initiative implement ergonomic measures through a national campaign “Lighter Work(s),” which aimed reduce construction workers With regard this interesting study, we would like request opinions study on some our following queries and comments concerning methodologies adopted study. In being discussed, implemented huge recruiting 4,500 from nine different subsets occupations within industry. Although current was national-level campaign, did not provide details how they determined sample size each substudy populations. Unfortunately, selection criteria participants were also specified. Past evidence has suggested that both inclusion exclusion are essential maximizing uniformity ensure reliable results [2], [3]. further information about applied study. Were any dropout rates considered calculation reporting results? Such may help estimate prediction rate design large-scale trials. Is it likely differ if aforementioned factors controlled addressed adequately? appreciate response these methodological issues, as such future researchers rigorous methodology trials. We effort separate questionnaires subset Standardization questionnaire population is necessary requirement obtain [4]. know handled issues pertaining reliability tool, especially when involves several an occupation. In addition, availability contents uniquely designed be practitioners field ergonomics/occupational safety health. previous aging, education status, level disability should developing avoid bias variations during data collection [5]. hear crucial confounding influence results. Perhaps, can suggest while implementing occupation? It very used social media-based interventional strategies. opinion, innovative approach deliver interventions at larger scales applaud scientific team adapting novel approach. line this, compliance improved tools YouTube, posters. share view advice matter. agree informative websites, YouTube videos, posters effective medium interventions. Nevertheless, curious learn monitored ensured all had performed correctly without supervisory process or measures. why qualitative focus group discussions Delphi methods preferred identify barriers facilitators study. We authors, studies need strategize improving equipment workers, increase use As direction forward, performing well-controlled control explore work. believe good start because gives new perspective dimension ergonomic industry conducting decrease Therefore, meticulous editor publish