Ergonomic Intervention for Musculoskeletal Disorders in Construction Workers.

作者: Vinothini Padmanathan , Leonard Joseph , Roslizawati Nawawi

DOI: 10.1016/J.SHAW.2015.06.006

关键词: PopulationKnow-howFocus groupHuman factors and ergonomicsApplied psychologyPsychologyData collectionSocial mediaSocial psychologyIntervention (counseling)Standardization

摘要: To the Editor, We read with great interest recently published article entitled “Use of Ergonomic Measures Related to Musculoskeletal Complaints among Construction Workers: A 2-year Follow-up Study” by Frings-Dresen et al [1]. intervention prevents work-related musculoskeletal injuries in workers. We compliment authors for their initiative implement ergonomic measures through a national campaign “Lighter Work(s),” which aimed reduce construction workers With regard this interesting study, we would like request opinions study on some our following queries and comments concerning methodologies adopted study. In being discussed, implemented huge recruiting 4,500 from nine different subsets occupations within industry. Although current was national-level campaign, did not provide details how they determined sample size each substudy populations. Unfortunately, selection criteria participants were also specified. Past evidence has suggested that both inclusion exclusion are essential maximizing uniformity ensure reliable results [2], [3]. further information about applied study. Were any dropout rates considered calculation reporting results? Such may help estimate prediction rate design large-scale trials. Is it likely differ if aforementioned factors controlled addressed adequately? appreciate response these methodological issues, as such future researchers rigorous methodology trials. We effort separate questionnaires subset Standardization questionnaire population is necessary requirement obtain [4]. know handled issues pertaining reliability tool, especially when involves several an occupation. In addition, availability contents uniquely designed be practitioners field ergonomics/occupational safety health. previous aging, education status, level disability should developing avoid bias variations during data collection [5]. hear crucial confounding influence results. Perhaps, can suggest while implementing occupation? It very used social media-based interventional strategies. opinion, innovative approach deliver interventions at larger scales applaud scientific team adapting novel approach. line this, compliance improved tools YouTube, posters. share view advice matter. agree informative websites, YouTube videos, posters effective medium interventions. Nevertheless, curious learn monitored ensured all had performed correctly without supervisory process or measures. why qualitative focus group discussions Delphi methods preferred identify barriers facilitators study. We authors, studies need strategize improving equipment workers, increase use As direction forward, performing well-controlled control explore work. believe good start because gives new perspective dimension ergonomic industry conducting decrease Therefore, meticulous editor publish

参考文章(5)
Jan Kottner, Laurent Audige, Stig Brorson, Allan Donner, Byron J. Gajewski, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Chris Roberts, Mohamed Shoukri, David L. Streiner, Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. International Journal of Nursing Studies. ,vol. 48, pp. 661- 671 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.IJNURSTU.2011.01.016
Lukas M Wildi, Anita Hensel, Maria Wertli, Beat A Michel, Johann Steurer, Relevant baseline characteristics for describing patients with knee osteoarthritis: results from a Delphi survey BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. ,vol. 14, pp. 369- 369 ,(2013) , 10.1186/1471-2474-14-369
Julitta S. Boschman, Monique H.W. Frings-Dresen, Henk F. van der Molen, Use of Ergonomic Measures Related to Musculoskeletal Complaints among Construction Workers: A 2-year Follow-up Study Safety and health at work. ,vol. 6, pp. 90- 96 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.SHAW.2014.12.003
Mircea Fagarasanu, Shrawan Kumar, Measurement instruments and data collection: a consideration of constructs and biases in ergonomics research International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. ,vol. 30, pp. 355- 369 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0169-8141(02)00101-4