作者: Christopher L Blanton ,
DOI: 10.17925/USOR.2015.8.1.23
关键词: Laser 、 LASIK 、 Ophthalmology 、 Optometry 、 Meta-analysis 、 Dioptre 、 Keratomileusis 、 Medicine 、 Visual acuity 、 Excimer laser 、 Refractive error
摘要: Purpose: To compare excimer laser platform outcomes for myopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Methods: A peer-reviewed literature search was conducted using the terms “myopia,” “LASIK,” and “outcomes.” Articles were selected based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. Data regarding Snellen visual acuity, refractive error ± 0.5 1.0 diopter (D) loss of best-corrected acuity extracted. US Food Drug Administration (FDA) approval studies used to fill any data gaps. Statistical analysis performed. Results: The Abbott outperformed other five multiple measures results at 1 3 months. Nidek lasers 20/16 level 6 Carl Zeiss/Meditec months outcome D. Alcon four safety category (least amount >2 line [BCVA]) month visit. There no significant differences between platforms, category, all time intervals. Conclusion: At times, fell within FDA guidelines bestcorrected acuity.