Dynamics of Labour and Capital Adjustment - A Comparison of Germany and the Netherlands

作者: Sher Verick , Sher Verick , Michael Polder

DOI:

关键词: EconomicsPanel dataDivergence (linguistics)Capital deepeningGermanLabour economicsInvestment (macroeconomics)Work (electrical)Flexibility (personality)Capital (economics)

摘要: In this paper we investigate the dynamic adjustment of labour and capital in German Dutch firms. The market is characterised by greater flexibility wages work arrangements comparison to Germany. These institutional differences imply that employment dynamics two countries should differ, particular, Netherlands be more responsive economic changes. On other hand, there unlikely such a divergence as investment conditions are similar. Our results consistent with hypothesis. Furthermore, no evidence regulations affect adjustment.

参考文章(25)
Robert Ferber, Determinants of Investment Behavior NBER Books. ,(1967)
L.W.M. Delsen, E. de Jong, The German and Dutch economies : who follows whom? Contributions to Economics. ,(1998)
Janice C. Eberly, Andrew B. Abel, Investment and q with Fixed Costs: An Empirical Analysis ,(2001)
Daniel S Hamermesh, Gerard A. Pfann, Gerard A. Pfann, Adjustment Costs in Factor Demand Journal of Economic Literature. ,vol. 34, pp. 1264- 1292 ,(1996)
M Ishaq Nadiri, Sherwin Rosen, Interrelated Factor Demand Functions The American Economic Review. ,vol. 59, pp. 457- 471 ,(1969)
Steven A. Barnett, Plutarchos Sakellaris, Nonlinear response of firm investment to Q Journal of Monetary Economics. ,vol. 42, pp. 261- 288 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0304-3932(98)00028-2
John Van Reenen, Stephen Bond, Microeconometric models of investment and employment Research Papers in Economics. ,(2003)
Wilko A. Letterie, Gerard A. Pfann, J.Michael Polder, Factor adjustment spikes and interrelation: an empirical investigation Economics Letters. ,vol. 85, pp. 145- 150 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.ECONLET.2004.03.017
Manuel Arellano, Stephen Bond, Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies. ,vol. 58, pp. 277- 297 ,(1991) , 10.2307/2297968