IRBs and security research: myths, facts and mission creep
DOI:
关键词: Institutional review board 、 Process (engineering) 、 Political science 、 Usability 、 Government 、 Interpretation (philosophy) 、 Mission creep 、 Negotiation 、 Human subject research 、 Law 、 Engineering ethics
摘要: Having decided to focus attention on the "weak link" of human fallibility, a growing number security researchers are discovering US Government's regulations that govern subject research. This paper discusses those regulations, their application research and usability, presents strategies for negotiating Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval process. It argues strict interpretation has potential stymie
simson.net 参考文章(4)
William B. Harvey, The Weakest Link A Commentary on the Connections Between K—12 and Higher Education American Behavioral Scientist. ,vol. 51, pp. 972- 983 ,(2008) , 10.1177/0002764207312000
CK Gunsalus, Edward M Bruner, Nicholas C Burbules, Leon Dash, Matthew Finkin, Joseph P Goldberg, William T Greenough, Gregory A Miller, Michael G Pratt, Mission creep in the IRB world. Science. ,vol. 312, pp. 1441- 1441 ,(2006) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1121479
JACK KATZ, Ethical escape routes for underground ethnographers American Ethnologist. ,vol. 33, pp. 499- 506 ,(2006) , 10.1525/AE.2006.33.4.499
Elizabeth Telfer, Robert (R. S.) Downie, Respect for Persons ,(1969)