Is Reasoning Useful
作者： Jean-François Bonnefon
DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-60049-3_2
关键词: Public sphere 、 Cognition 、 Plague (disease) 、 Syllogism 、 Morality 、 Sociology 、 Feature (linguistics) 、 Epistemology 、 General problem 、 Public debate
摘要: Research on reasoning does not inspire public debate or policymakers. This absence from the sphere cannot be attributed to some general problem that would plague all fields concerned with higher cognition, because research decision making and morality feature prominently in policy debates. The partly stems choice of focusing highly unusual forms (such as syllogistic deduction), removed everyday conditions which we reason. Refocusing uncertainty, preferences, intuitions allows specialists tackle social concerns; it makes fully interoperable decisions morality.
springer.com
sci-hub.se 参考文章(104)
K.I. Manktelow, D.E. Over, Social roles and utilities in reasoning with deontic conditionals. Cognition. ,vol. 39, pp. 85- 105 ,(1991) , 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90039-7
Jonathan St. B. T. Evans, David E. Over, Rationality in the selection task: Epistemic utility versus uncertainty reduction. Psychological Review. ,vol. 103, pp. 356- 363 ,(1996) , 10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.356
Valerie F. Reyna, Frank Farley, Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy Psychological Science in the Public Interest. ,vol. 7, pp. 1- 44 ,(2006) , 10.1111/J.1529-1006.2006.00026.X
Mike Oaksford, Nick Chater, Becki Grainger, Probabilistic effects in data selection Thinking & Reasoning. ,vol. 5, pp. 193- 243 ,(1999) , 10.1080/135467899393986
Takeo Tsujii, Shigeru Watanabe, Neural correlates of dual-task effect on belief-bias syllogistic reasoning: a near-infrared spectroscopy study. Brain Research. ,vol. 1287, pp. 118- 125 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.BRAINRES.2009.06.080
Denis J. Hilton, Markus Kemmelmeier, Jean-François Bonnefon, Putting ifs to work: goal-based relevance in conditional directives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. ,vol. 134, pp. 388- 405 ,(2005) , 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.388
Denise Dellarosa Cummins, Robert C. Cummins, Emotion and deliberative reasoning in moral judgment. Frontiers in Psychology. ,vol. 3, pp. 328- 328 ,(2012) , 10.3389/FPSYG.2012.00328
Bastien Trémolière, Wim De Neys, Jean-François Bonnefon, Mortality salience and morality: Thinking about death makes people less utilitarian Cognition. ,vol. 124, pp. 379- 384 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.COGNITION.2012.05.011
Jonathan St. B. T. Evans, Simon J. Handley, David E. Over, Conditionals and conditional probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. ,vol. 29, pp. 321- 335 ,(2003) , 10.1037/0278-7393.29.2.321
Robyn Macpherson, Keith E. Stanovich, Cognitive Ability, Thinking Dispositions, and Instructional Set as Predictors of Critical Thinking. Learning and Individual Differences. ,vol. 17, pp. 115- 127 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.LINDIF.2007.05.003