作者: Umberto Provenzani , Laura Fusar-Poli , Natascia Brondino , Stefano Damiani , Marco Vercesi
关键词: Randomized controlled trial 、 Psychological intervention 、 Clinical psychology 、 Childhood Autism Rating Scale 、 Psychology 、 Autism 、 Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule 、 Rating scale 、 Clinical trial 、 Autism spectrum disorder
摘要: The number of trials aimed at evaluating treatments for autism spectrum disorder has been increasing progressively. However, it is not clear which outcome measures should be used to assess their efficacy, especially target core symptoms. present review provide a comprehensive overview regarding the in clinical people with disorder. We systematically searched Web KnowledgeSM database between 1980 and 2016 identify published controlled investigating efficacy interventions included 406 final database, from total 327 were identified. Only seven scales more than 5% studies, among only three measured symptoms (Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Childhood Autism Rating Scale, Social Responsiveness Scale). Of note, 69% tools literature once. Our systematic shown that evaluation intervention relies on heterogeneous often non-specific this condition. fragmentation may significantly hamper comparisons studies thus discovery effective Greater consensus choice these reached.