The concept of dementia: retain, reframe, rename or replace?

作者: Alexander F. Kurz , Nicola T. Lautenschlager

DOI: 10.1017/S1041610209991013

关键词: TerminologyDiseasePsychologyDementiaInjury preventionCognitive psychologyCognitionDevelopmental psychologyPoison controlRenameCognitive reframing

摘要: From antiquity the term "dementia" has denoted a state of severe acquired intellectual deterioration which significantly interferes with fulfillment personal, social or occupational roles, and makes individual dependent on care supervision by others. The medical concept dementia refers to pattern cognitive behavioral symptoms typically arises from chronic often progressive brain diseases. quantitative expression this shows broad variability, some patients fall within boundaries whose functional abilities are only mildly impaired. On other hand, currently an unduly narrow qualitative bandwidth, because it is modeled after subtype occurs in Alzheimer's disease but does not represent good fit for important subtypes. In authors' view, should be retained despite its limitations, since role directing physician's attention certain group underlying pathologies. This diagnostic will remain primary even if biological indicators one several etiologies become part routine research units future. construct further value entitles treatment, assistance legal protection. Although our opinion need replaced, upcoming revisions psychiatric classification systems have reframe emphasizing heterogeneity psychopathological symptom pattern. view increasing importance early diagnosis however, "dementia", literally means "absence mind", no longer appropriate timely designation range limitations covered concept. It renamed, using terminology accommodates scientific advance meets requirements communication while preserving benefits their families.

参考文章(35)
Lisa Mosconi, Brain glucose metabolism in the early and specific diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. FDG-PET studies in MCI and AD. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. ,vol. 32, pp. 486- 510 ,(2005) , 10.1007/S00259-005-1762-7
E. Rimmer, M Wojciechowska, C. Stave, A. Sganga, B. O'Connell, Implications of the Facing Dementia Survey for the general population, patients and caregivers across Europe. International Journal of Clinical Practice. ,vol. 59, pp. 17- 24 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.1368-504X.2005.00482.X
Christian Derouesné, 2. Un concept flou Psychologie & Neuropsychiatrie Du Vieillissement. ,vol. 1, pp. 15- 24 ,(2003)
Rhonda J. V. Montgomery, Tracy X. Karner, Karl Kosloski, Weighing the Success of a National Alzheimer's Disease Service Demonstration Journal of Aging & Social Policy. ,vol. 14, pp. 119- 139 ,(2002) , 10.1300/J031V14N03_07
A. Burns, P. Robert, The National Dementia strategy in England. BMJ. ,vol. 338, pp. 139- 140 ,(2009) , 10.1136/BMJ.B931
Timo Erkinjuntti, Serge Gauthier, None, Vascular Cognitive Impairment ,(2002)
D.W. O'Connor, G. Blessed, B. Cooper, C. Jonker, J.C. Morris, I.B. Presnell, D. Ames, D.W.K. Kay, H. Bickel, M. Schaufele, A. Wind, M. Coats, L. Berg, Cross-national interrater reliability of dementia diagnosis in the elderly and factors associated with disagreement Neurology. ,vol. 47, pp. 1194- 1199 ,(1996) , 10.1212/WNL.47.5.1194
Edmond Chiu, What's in a name?dementia or dysmentia? International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. ,vol. 9, pp. 1- 4 ,(1994) , 10.1002/GPS.930090102
Don I. Trachtenberg, John Q. Trojanowski, Dementia: a word to be forgotten. JAMA Neurology. ,vol. 65, pp. 593- 595 ,(2008) , 10.1001/ARCHNEUR.65.5.593