Matrix Attachment Regions and Transcriptional Gene Silencing

作者: William F. Thompson , Steven Spiker , George C. Allen

DOI: 10.1002/9780470988886.CH6

关键词: TransgeneGeneRNA-induced transcriptional silencingScaffold/matrix attachment regionCosuppressionGeneticsBiologyTrans-acting siRNARegulation of gene expressionRNA silencing

摘要: It was realized early in the history of transgenic work that expression genes transferred to plant genomes not always stable or predictable. Such variation has often been attributed position effects, such as those known occur Drosophila (Pal-Bhadra et al., 2004). Position effects are presumed reflect pre-existing differences chromatin structure other genomic features at different sites transgene integration. However, it is now clear also affected, and may even be blocked altogether (silenced), by mechanisms largely independent chromosomal integration site. For example, 1989 Matzke group reported inactivation methylation transgenes from a first transformation following second with another T-DNA. Soon thereafter, back papers Napoli al. (1990) van der Krol cosuppression homologous host genes, Lindbo (1993) transgene-induced virus resistance associated cytoplasmic activity targets specific RNA sequences for inactivation. Many subsequent reports have highlighted fact quite frequently subject silencing. One particularly dramatic example comes Meyer (1992), who set up an experiment designed trap transposons inserting into petunia. The maize A1 gene, white-flowered mutant petunia, conferred salmon-red color phenotype flowers. Transposon insertions inactivating should, therefore, create white sectors otherwise salmoncolored Expecting events rare, large field involving 30 000 individuals. Instead expected rare events, however, they found variety phenotypes, including fully variegated flowers, very high frequency. A few flowers were deletions transgene, but many others, showing variegation developmental shifts expression, status 35S promoter. likelihood seemed increase age which seed derived, well response several environmental factors temperature.

参考文章(169)
Klaus Petersen, Robert Leah, Søren Knudsen, Verena Cameron-Mills, Matrix attachment regions (MARs) enhance transformation frequencies and reduce variance of transgene expression in barley Plant Molecular Biology. ,vol. 49, pp. 45- 58 ,(2002) , 10.1023/A:1014464127973
M. A. Matzke, M. Primig, J. Trnovsky, A. J. M. Matzke, Reversible methylation and inactivation of marker genes in sequentially transformed tobacco plants. The EMBO Journal. ,vol. 8, pp. 643- 649 ,(1989) , 10.1002/J.1460-2075.1989.TB03421.X
Zaiquan Cheng, Jayaprakash Targolli, Ray Wu, Tobacco matrix attachment region sequence increased transgene expression levels in rice plants Molecular Breeding. ,vol. 7, pp. 317- 327 ,(2001) , 10.1023/A:1011655214556
Sylvie De Buck, Marc Van Montagu, Ann Depicker, Transgene silencing of invertedly repeated transgenes is released upon deletion of one of the transgenes involved. Plant Molecular Biology. ,vol. 46, pp. 433- 445 ,(2001) , 10.1023/A:1010614522706
Lyudmila Sidorenko, Wesley Bruce, Sheila Maddock, Laura Tagliani, Xianggan Li, Michael Daniels, Thomas Peterson, Functional analysis of two matrix attachment region (MAR) elements in transgenic maize plants Transgenic Research. ,vol. 12, pp. 137- 154 ,(2003) , 10.1023/A:1022908614356
Robert Ascenzi, Bekir Ülker, Joselyn J Todd, Dolores A Sowinski, Carolyn R Schimeneck, George C Allen, Arthur K Weissinger, William F Thompson, Analysis of trans-silencing interactions using transcriptional silencers of varying strength and targets with and without flanking nuclear matrix attachment regions. Transgenic Research. ,vol. 12, pp. 305- 318 ,(2003) , 10.1023/A:1023310118231
George C. Allen, Steven Spiker, William F. Thompson, Use of matrix attachment regions (MARs) to minimize transgene silencing Plant Molecular Biology. ,vol. 43, pp. 361- 376 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1006424621037
S. Maximova, C. Miller, G. Antúnez de Mayolo, S. Pishak, A. Young, M. J. Guiltinan, Stable transformation of Theobroma cacao L. and influence of matrix attachment regions on GFP expression Plant Cell Reports. ,vol. 21, pp. 872- 883 ,(2003) , 10.1007/S00299-003-0596-7