Habitat selection and use by sympatric, translocated greater sage‐grouse and Columbian sharp‐tailed grouse

作者: Kourtney F. Stonehouse , Lisa A. Shipley , Jason Lowe , Michael T. Atamian , Mark E. Swanson

DOI: 10.1002/JWMG.990

关键词: Conservation Reserve ProgramGrouseHabitatGeographyVegetationShrub-steppeNestForbTympanuchus phasianellus columbianusEcology

摘要: Greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) and Columbian sharp-tailed grouse (Tympanuchus phasianellus columbianus) have declined substantially in Washington, USA, primarily because native shrub-steppe has been converted to agriculture. In response, state federal agencies acquired restored habitat, augmented reintroduced suitable areas. We examined how sympatric, translocated used space selected habitats within their spring–summer home ranges at nest sites remnant surrounded by a matrix of cropland eastern Washington. Because life-history requirements differ, we expected extensive habitat partitioning between species. Using radiolocations ≥43 birds each species, found that had larger than grouse, the composite for fell almost completely sage-grouse. By creating resource utilization function models using ≥53 areas highest predicted intensity use both species overlapped >50%, even top 5% quantile. Both fields farther from trees roads or distribution lines more intensely. Sage-grouse less rugged intensely, 3 levels shrub cover equally. To compare selection relative available nesting created ≥30 lines, whereas fields. When vegetation characteristics female case-control, versus non-use design ≥26 with greater cover, lower annual forb taller perennial grasses, grass grasses forbs. compared features measured moderate dense sparse fields, higher patch diversity, grouse. These differences resulted only 38% overlap quartile values 2 <10% many western states are highly fragmented cropland, understanding populations different characteristics, such as coexist remaining tracts spatial scales is important effectively conserving managing communities. © 2015 The Wildlife Society.

参考文章(68)
Michael Glen. Cope, , Distribution, habitat selection and survival of transplanted Columbian sharp-tailed grouse (Tympanuchus phasianellus columbianus) in the Tobacco Valley, Montana Montana State University [and] Montana Dept. of Fish, Wildlife &amp; Parks,. ,vol. 1992, pp. 1- 60 ,(1992) , 10.5962/BHL.TITLE.77304
Alison G. Lyon, Stanley H. Anderson, Potential gas development impacts on sage grouse nest initiation and movement Wildlife Society Bulletin. ,vol. 31, pp. 486- 491 ,(2003)
R. J. Robel, J. N. Briggs, A. D. Dayton, L. C. Hulbert, Relationships between visual obstruction measurements and weight of grassland vegetation. Journal of Range Management. ,vol. 23, pp. 295- 297 ,(1970) , 10.2307/3896225
Colin M. Sveum, W. Daniel Edge, John A. Crawford, Nesting habitat selection by sage grouse in south-central Washington Journal of Range Management. ,vol. 51, pp. 265- 269 ,(1998) , 10.2307/4003409
S. C. Bunting, J. L. Kingery, M. A. Schroeder, Assessing the Restoration Potential of Altered Rangeland Ecosystems in the Interior Columbia Basin Ecological Restoration. ,vol. 21, pp. 77- 86 ,(2003) , 10.3368/ER.21.2.77
John W. Connelly, Howard W. Browers, Robert J. Gates, Seasonal Movements of Sage Grouse in Southeastern Idaho The Journal of Wildlife Management. ,vol. 52, pp. 116- ,(1988) , 10.2307/3801070
Michael R. Conover, Jennifer S. Borgo, Rebekah E. Dritz, Jonathan B. Dinkins, David K. Dahlgren, Greater Sage-Grouse Select Nest Sites to Avoid Visual Predators but not Olfactory Predators The Condor. ,vol. 112, pp. 331- 336 ,(2010) , 10.1525/COND.2010.090172
Matthew R. Dzialak, Chad V. Olson, Seth M. Harju, Stephen L. Webb, James P. Mudd, Jeffrey B. Winstead, L.D. Hayden-Wing, Identifying and prioritizing greater sage-grouse nesting and brood-rearing habitat for conservation in human-modified landscapes. PLOS ONE. ,vol. 6, ,(2011) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0026273
CHRISTIN L. PRUETT, MICHAEL A. PATTEN, DONALD H. WOLFE, Avoidance Behavior by Prairie Grouse: Implications for Development of Wind Energy Conservation Biology. ,vol. 23, pp. 1253- 1259 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2009.01254.X
Peter S. Coates, David J. Delehanty, Nest Predation of Greater Sage-Grouse in Relation to Microhabitat Factors and Predators Journal of Wildlife Management. ,vol. 74, pp. 240- 248 ,(2010) , 10.2193/2009-047