Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reveals a dissociation between SNARC and MARC effects: Implication for the polarity correspondence account

作者: Elisa Di Rosa , Lara Bardi , Carlo Umiltà , Fabio Masina , Margherita Forgione

DOI: 10.1016/J.CORTEX.2017.05.002

关键词: Visual searchNumber linePosterior parietal cortexStimulus–response compatibilityTranscranial direct-current stimulationStimulus (physiology)NeuroscienceMental representationPsychologyCommunicationSalience (neuroscience)

摘要: The concept of stimulus response compatibility (SRC) refers to the existence a privileged association between specific feature and feature. Two examples SRC are Spatial Numerical Association Response Codes (SNARC) Markedness (MARC) effects. According polarity correspondence principle, these two effects occur because match most salient dimensions response. Specifically, SNARC effect would be caused by right-sided responses large numbers, while even numbers give rise MARC effect. aim present study was test validity principle in explaining To this end, we applied transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over left right posterior parietal cortex (PPC), which is thought neural basis salience processing, during parity judgement task. Results showed that cathodal tDCS PPC significantly reduced but did not affect effect, suggesting dissociation That is, rely on processing mechanism, whereas not. Despite interpretation need further experimental confirmations (i.e., testing different tasks or using montages), our results suggest can plausible explanation only for

参考文章(53)
David H Landy, Erin L Jones, John E Hummel, None, Why spatial-numeric associations aren't evidence for a mental number line Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. ,vol. 30, ,(2008)
Michael A. Nitsche, David Liebetanz, Andrea Antal, Nicolas Lang, Frithjof Tergau, Walter Paulus, Chapter 27 Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation – technical, safety and functional aspects Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Proceedings of the 2nd International Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Symposium. ,vol. 56, pp. 255- 276 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S1567-424X(09)70230-2
Christopher D Wickens, Sallie E Gordon, Yili Liu, J Lee, None, An introduction to human factors engineering ,(1997)
Robert W. Proctor, Trisha Van Zandt, Human factors in simple and complex systems ,(1993)
Carlo Umiltá, Roberto Nicoletti, Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Advances in psychology. ,vol. 65, pp. 89- 116 ,(1990) , 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61219-4
Bernhard Hommel, Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility Advances in psychology. ,vol. 118, pp. 281- 320 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0166-4115(97)80041-6
Earl A. Alluisi, Joel S. Warm, Things That Go Together: A Review of Stimulus-Response Compatibility and Related Effects Advances in psychology. ,vol. 65, pp. 3- 30 ,(1990) , 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61217-0
Ritske De Jong, Chia-Chin Liang, Erick Lauber, Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. ,vol. 20, pp. 731- 750 ,(1994) , 10.1037//0096-1523.20.4.731