Overuse of proton pump inhibitors.

作者: M. Naunton , G. M. Peterson , M. D. Bleasel

DOI: 10.1046/J.1365-2710.2000.00312.X

关键词: Medical recordProton-pump inhibitorRetrospective cohort studyEsophageal diseaseEsophagitisChemotherapyEndoscopyGastroenterologyMedicineAdverse effectInternal medicine

摘要: Background: There have been concerns raised about the potential adverse effects of proton pump inhibitors, especially with long-term use. In particular, their potent action can suppress features and delay diagnosis gastric cancer, while prolonged exposure may hasten development carcinoids. Aim: To examine use inhibitors in patients at major teaching hospital Tasmania, Australia, principally to determine appropriateness therapy according published guidelines. Methods: A retrospective review medical records all prescribed any over a 7-month period, was performed. An extensive range demographic clinical variables recorded for each patient. The were also asked series questions during hospitalization extract some relevant information – if when they had undergone endoscopy. Results: 200 (52% males) mean age 69 ± 16·4 years. most common indications using acute gastrointestinal bleeding (20·9%), severe refractory ulcerating oesophagitis (17·3%), mild/moderate oesophageal reflux (17·3%) peptic ulcer (11·7%). large number inhibitor ‘other’ (39·6%). prescribing satisfied approved indications, as outlined Australian Schedule Pharmaceutical Benefits, only 37·1% cases. Endoscopy performed 54·1% prior commencing within next 7 days another 12·8% patients. Only 59% previously treated an H2-receptor antagonist before inhibitor. Even worse, 58·5% used oesophagitis. median duration admitted already receiving one drugs 450 days. Over half being concurrently other which are known cause or exacerbate gastro-oesophageal disease, 18% smokers. Conclusions: Whereas undoubtedly effective agents, studies practice consistently suggest over-use endoscopy, who do not fit criteria, ‘less powerful’ agents should sufficiently patient’s symptoms. This poses economic safety concerns, particularly light suggestion that these could cancer.

参考文章(35)
Peter I Pillans, Paul Kubler, James M Radford, Victoria Overland, Concordance between use of proton pump inhibitors and prescribing guidelines The Medical Journal of Australia. ,vol. 172, pp. 16- 18 ,(2000) , 10.5694/J.1326-5377.2000.TB123871.X
Peter McManus, John Marley, Donald J. Birkett, Julie Lindner, Compliance with restrictions on the subsidized use of proton pump inhibitors in Australia. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. ,vol. 46, pp. 409- 411 ,(1998) , 10.1046/J.1365-2125.1998.00791.X
H. LEUFKENS, A. CLAESSENS, E. HEERDINK, J. VAN EIJK, C. B. H. W. LAMERS, A prospective follow‐up study of 5669 users of lansoprazole in daily practice Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. ,vol. 11, pp. 887- 897 ,(1997) , 10.1046/J.1365-2036.1997.00214.X
Elizabeth H. Boath, Alison Blenkinsopp, The rise and rise of proton pump inhibitor drugs: Patients' perspectives Social Science & Medicine. ,vol. 45, pp. 1571- 1579 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00094-4
W. Creutzfeldt, R. Lamberts, Session 6: Is Hypergastrinaemia Dangerous to Man? Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. ,vol. 180, pp. 179- 191 ,(1991) , 10.3109/00365529109093198
Cyrus R. Kumana, Tai-Ying Ching, Edmund Cheung, Yvonne Kong, Maybelle Kou, Chi Kuen Chan, Kent-Man Chu, Wing-Hong Seto, Shiu-Kum Lam, Antiulcer drug prescribing in hospital successfully influenced by "immediate concurrent feedback" Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. ,vol. 64, pp. 569- 574 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0009-9236(98)90141-2
S. J. ROBERTS, D. N. BATEMAN, Prescribing of antacids and ulcer-healing drugs in primary care in the north of England. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. ,vol. 9, pp. 137- 143 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1365-2036.1995.TB00362.X
Ekman L, Hansson E, Havu N, Carlsson E, Lundberg C, Toxicological studies on omeprazole. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. ,vol. 108, pp. 53- 69 ,(1985) , 10.3109/00365528509095819