NREGA AND RURAL WATER MANAGEMENT IN INDIA: Improving the Welfare Effects

作者: M. Dinesh Kumar , Nitin Bassi

DOI:

关键词: EconomicsRural povertyRight to workEconomic growthLivelihoodDevelopment economicsRural areaSafety netSocial protectionUnemploymentWelfare

摘要: NREGA is being eulogized by many in the academic, development and policy arena as a "silver bullet" for eradicating rural poverty unemployment, way of generating demand productive labour force villages private incentives management common property resources. The paper argues that nature water activities chosen under scheme callous which these are planned implemented different regions, without any consideration to their physical socio-economic realities regions concerned, creating several negative welfare effects. identifies three broad distinct regional typologies India deciding interventions proposes types works NREGS each typology, has potential generate demand, while producing 1. BACKGROUND Rural unemployment have grown an unprecedented manner during last few decades. There growing incidence youth shifting from agriculture into unproductive activities, compounding this problem. In order reverse trend provide livelihood security unemployed, Government (GOI) enacted National Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA) 1 , 2005. act provides 100 days guaranteed employment every household financial year unskilled manual work. initially notified 200 districts, at present covers 619 districts (99% country) expected benefit some 5.5 crore poorest households 2009-10 (Sharma 2009). With budget allocation Rs. 11,300 2006-07 2 umbrella NREGA, probably largest rights-based social protection initiative world (Farrington et al. 2007). As per Schedule I Act, work Scheme (NREGS) will be essentially creation sustainable assets. builds on earlier experience with (EGS) Maharashtra (Sjoblom Farrington 2008). key component provision state prescribed wage those unable find alternative employment, form safety net unemployed people. Long term objectives includes; a) enhancement areas, b) assets, c) protecting environment, d) empowering women and, e) fostering equity. Apart affirming 'right work', also seeks ensure poor say decisions undertaken, so such contribute improvement livelihoods (McCord

参考文章(9)
Chetan Pandit, Some common fallacies about floods and flood management. Current Science. ,vol. 97, pp. 991- 993 ,(2009)
M. Dinesh Kumar, Ankit Patel, Om Prakash Singh, R. Ravindranath, Shantanu Ghosh, Rainwater harvesting in India: some critical issues for basin planning and research Land Use and Water Resources Research. ,vol. 6, pp. 1- 17 ,(2006) , 10.22004/AG.ECON.47964
Sujata Gupta, Akram Javed, Divya Datt, Economics of Flood Protection in India Natural Hazards. ,vol. 28, pp. 199- 210 ,(2003) , 10.1023/A:1021142404009
Charles Batchelor, John Butterworth, Ashok Singh, Chatham Maritime, Rama Mohan Rao, MITIGATING THE POTENTIAL UNINTENDED IMPACTS OF WATER HARVESTING 1 ,(2002)
M Dinesh Kumar, Ankit Patel, O P Singh, R Ravindranath, chasing a Mirage: Water Harvesting and artificial recharge in Naturally Water-Scarce regions ,(2008)
M. D. Kumar, A. Narayanamoorthy, O. P. Singh, Groundwater Irrigation versus Surface Irrigation Economic and Political Weekly. ,vol. 44, pp. 72- 73 ,(2009)