Cost Effectiveness of Colonoscopy, Based on the Appropriateness of an Indication

作者: Cesare Hassan , Emilio Di Giulio , Perry J. Pickhardt , Angelo Zullo , Andrea Laghi

DOI: 10.1016/J.CGH.2008.06.009

关键词: MEDLINESurgeryColorectal cancerIntensive care medicineMedicinePopulationConfidence intervalCost–benefit analysisCost effectivenessSurveillance, Epidemiology, and End ResultsColonoscopy

摘要: Background & Aims Determination of the appropriateness an indication for colonoscopy has been advanced as a means to help rationalize use endoscopic resources. However, efficacy and cost effectiveness current guidelines used select patients are largely unknown. The goal this study was assess clinical economic impact American Society Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European Panel on in selecting who referred colonoscopy, relation colorectal cancer (CRC) detection. Methods A decision-analysis model constructed compare strategies "appropriate" indications with those which is deemed "inappropriate" or "generally not indicated." 50% upstaging modeled simulate progression colonoscopy. CRC prevalence estimated using pooled data analysis based systematic review literature. Costs care were from Medicare reimbursement data. number colonoscopies needed detect one case prevent cancer-related death incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), according categories, computed simulated population that 60 years age Results numbers appropriate inappropriate be performed patient 18 93, respectively. Similarly, 115 617 would needed, respectively, CRC-related death. ICER colonoscopies, compared policy referring $6154 $31,807 per life-year gained, In sensitivity analysis, only reduction baseline value 1.1% 0.2% associated higher than $150,000. Conclusions Current regarding relatively inefficient excluding clinically meaningful risk whom generally indicated, raising serious concerns about their applicability practice.

参考文章(37)
Fabio Levi, Patrick Maisonneuve, Rosa Filiberti, Carlo La Vecchia, Peter Boyle, Cancer incidence and mortality in Europe Sozial-und Praventivmedizin. ,vol. 34, ,(1989) , 10.1007/BF02148558
C. HASSAN, A. LAGHI, P. J. PICKHARDT, D. H. KIM, A. ZULLO, F. IAFRATE, S. MORINI, Projected impact of colorectal cancer screening with computerized tomographic colonography on current radiological capacity in Europe. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. ,vol. 27, pp. 366- 374 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1365-2036.2007.03575.X
Steven J. Stryker, Bruce G. Wolff, Clyde E. Culp, Susan D. Libbe, Duane M. Ilstrup, Robert L. MacCarty, Natural history of untreated colonic polyps. Gastroenterology. ,vol. 93, pp. 1009- 1013 ,(1987) , 10.1016/0016-5085(87)90563-4
A. Jemal, R. Siegel, E. Ward, T. Murray, J. Xu, M. J. Thun, Cancer statistics, 2007. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. ,vol. 57, pp. 43- 66 ,(2007) , 10.3322/CANJCLIN.57.1.43
David A. Lieberman, Cost-effectiveness model for colon cancer screening Gastroenterology. ,vol. 109, pp. 1781- 1790 ,(1995) , 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90744-0
David A. Lieberman, Jennifer Holub, Glenn Eisen, Dale Kraemer, Cynthia D. Morris, Prevalence of Polyps Greater Than 9 mm in a Consortium of Diverse Clinical Practice Settings in the United States Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. ,vol. 3, pp. 798- 805 ,(2005) , 10.1016/S1542-3565(05)00405-2
G. Bersani, A. Rossi, G. Ricci, V. Pollino, G. DeFabritiis, A. Suzzi, V. Alvisi, Do ASGE guidelines for the appropriate use of colonoscopy enhance the probability of finding relevant pathologies in an open access service Digestive and Liver Disease. ,vol. 37, pp. 609- 614 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.DLD.2005.03.008
Tammy O. Tengs, Amy Wallace, One Thousand Health-Related Quality-of-Life Estimates Medical Care. ,vol. 38, pp. 583- 637 ,(2000) , 10.1097/00005650-200006000-00004
L. W. Pickle, Y. Hao, A. Jemal, Z. Zou, R. C. Tiwari, E. Ward, M. Hachey, H. L. Howe, E. J. Feuer, A new method of estimating United States and state-level cancer incidence counts for the current calendar year. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. ,vol. 57, pp. 30- 42 ,(2007) , 10.3322/CANJCLIN.57.1.30