Alcohol screening in primary care

作者: E. P Whitlock

DOI: 10.1136/BMJ.327.7429.E263

关键词: Systematic reviewBrief interventionNumber needed to screenRandomized controlled trialAlternative medicineFamily medicinePrimary careTrustworthinessMedicinePediatricsIntervention (counseling)General Medicine

摘要: Behind the numbers What should primary care doctors do about screening for alcohol problems? Beich and colleagues (p 590) seem to have provided answer: Nothing. Some will consider their results authoritative conclude these activities are ineffective in general practice. But as with all systematic reviews meta-analyses, there can be devils details. Beich et al addressed a clinically important question: “How effective is practice identifying drinkers who benefit from brief intervention?” The most trustworthy answer would come randomized controlled trial of intervention compared no or intervention, but such studies exist.1 provide direct measurement number needed screen (NNS) one patient.2 In absence evaluating evidence, reviewers forced examine link separate bodies evidence (Is test accurate? How intervention?). With …

参考文章(5)
Michael R Polen, C Tracy Orleans, Alfred Berg, Carla A Green, Jonathan Klein, Evelyn P Whitlock, Albert Siu, Behavioral Counseling Interventions in Primary Care to Reduce Risky/Harmful Alcohol Use Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). ,(2004)
Robert A. Senft, Michael R. Polen, Donald K. Freeborn, Jack F. Hollis, Brief intervention in a primary care setting for hazardous drinkers. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. ,vol. 13, pp. 464- 470 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0749-3797(18)30143-0
Ellyn A. Stauffacher, Michael F. Fleming, Kristen Lawton Barry, Linda Baier Manwell, Wendy Adams, Brief physician advice for alcohol problems in older adults: a randomized community-based trial. Journal of Family Practice. ,vol. 48, pp. 378- 384 ,(1999)