Automatic Control of the Software Development Process with Regard to Risk Analysis

作者: Marian Jureczko

DOI: 10.5772/45736

关键词: Development testingAgile software developmentSoftware development processSoftware developmentRisk analysis (engineering)Computer scienceAutomatic controlSoftwareSystems development life cycleSoftware Engineering Process Group

摘要: In this paper, we present a method for analysing risk in software development. Before describing the details, let us define basic terms that are important further discussion. Among them, most import is risk. context of engineering it represents any potential situation or event can negatively affect project future and may arise from some action. Software risks usually scheduling, cost product quality. Further details given Section 2.2. The will be discussed requirements releases. (or requirement model) represent requests customer should transformed into features implemented product. releases refer to phase development life cycle. It term used denote ready has been delivered customer. This work takes consideration agile (i.e. processes with short iterations many releases) therefore, emphasized internal. These not scheduled customer; nevertheless they ’potentially shippable’.

参考文章(61)
Markus Lumpe, Rajesh Vasa, Allan Jones, Helix software evolution data set Cite this work as: Vasa, R., Lumpe, M., and Jones, A. (2010). Growth and change dynamics in open source software systems. Research dataset. Melbourne: Swinburne University of Technology. ,(2010)
Marian Jureczko, Michal Mlynarski, Automated acceptance testing tools for web applications using Test-Driven Development Przegląd Elektrotechniczny. pp. 198- 202 ,(2010)
Stuart E. Madnick, Tarek Abdel-Hamid, Software Project Dynamics: An Integrated Approach ,(1991)
James Cadle, Donald Yeates, Project Management for Information Systems ,(1991)
Watts S. Humphrey, A discipline for software engineering ,(1995)
S. Kusumoto, S. Hanabusa, K. Inoue, Y. Maegawa, F. Matukawa, Estimating effort by use case points: method, tool and case study ieee international software metrics symposium. pp. 292- 299 ,(2004) , 10.1109/METRICS.2004.21