A study on the thermal-hydrodynamical-coupled CO2 flow process in the Ordos CCS-geological-formation

作者: Hongwu Lei , Yuna Cai , Meng Lu , Xiaochun Li , Luke Daulton Connell

DOI: 10.1016/J.IJGGC.2020.102999

关键词: Flow (psychology)Volumetric flow ratePhase transitionHeat exchangerThermalPetroleum engineeringPlumeImaginationGeological formationGeology

摘要: Abstract Non-isothermal flow in wellbores and geological formations is an important process associated with geologic storage of CO2. Technically, simulation it a highly challenging task as often encounters phase transition problems for the fluids involved, which may greatly influence profiles pressure, temperature, flowrate along wellbore consequently changes injectivity relevant gas injection. In this paper we present coupled non-isothermal wellbore/reservoir model simulating behaviors, CO2Well reservoir simulator TOUGH2/ECO2N are combined to form novel model. The developed compared verified by existing wellbore-reservoir T2Well two CO2 injection examples. These examples demonstrate that method has considerable computational advantages flows when occurs. We then apply Ordos CCS demonstration project China, investigate sophisticated, thermal-hydrodynamically-coupled processes observed there owning condensed, cold was directly captured from nearby coal liquefaction plant. results obtained simulation, field observations, provide in-depth insights into behaviors both formation. For example, revealed that, wellbore, heat exchange between injected surrounding rock plays critical role temperature distribution. It also occurred transferred period time shut-in time. addition, observation showed most entered topmost layer due high transmissivity rock. temperature-change zone travelled slower than plume. plume extended 430 m away site after 31 months injection, while merely about 90 m away, much smaller suggests at 0.83 kg/(MPa·s). should be relatively (e.g., above −3 °C if rate more 9.45 kg/s) avoid formation hydrate subsurface.

参考文章(40)
Jian Xie, Keni Zhang, Litang Hu, Paul Pavelic, Yongsheng Wang, Maoshan Chen, Field-based simulation of a demonstration site for carbon dioxide sequestration in low-permeability saline aquifers in the Ordos Basin, China Hydrogeology Journal. ,vol. 23, pp. 1465- 1480 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S10040-015-1267-9
Jian Xie, Keni Zhang, Litang Hu, Yongsheng Wang, Maoshan Chen, Understanding the carbon dioxide sequestration in low-permeability saline aquifers in the Ordos Basin with numerical simulations Greenhouse Gases-Science and Technology. ,vol. 5, pp. 558- 576 ,(2015) , 10.1002/GHG.1499
Karsten Pruess, ECO2N: A TOUGH2 Fluid Property Module for Mixtures of Water, NaCl, and CO2 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. ,(2005) , 10.2172/877331
Kalyan Annamalai, Ishwar K Puri, Milind A Jog, Advanced Thermodynamics Engineering ,(2001)
Ning Wei, Magdalena Gill, Dustin Crandall, Dustin McIntyre, Yan Wang, Kathy Bruner, Xiaochun Li, Grant Bromhal, CO2 flooding properties of Liujiagou sandstone: influence of sub-core scale structure heterogeneity Greenhouse Gases-Science and Technology. ,vol. 4, pp. 400- 418 ,(2014) , 10.1002/GHG.1407
Lehua Pan, Curtis M. Oldenburg, T2Well-An integrated wellbore-reservoir simulator Computers & Geosciences. ,vol. 65, pp. 46- 55 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.CAGEO.2013.06.005
C. M. Oldenburg, B. M. Freifeld, K. Pruess, L. Pan, S. Finsterle, G. J. Moridis, Numerical simulations of the Macondo well blowout reveal strong control of oil flow by reservoir permeability and exsolution of gas Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 109, pp. 20254- 20259 ,(2012) , 10.1073/PNAS.1105165108
Olav Hansen, Douglas Gilding, Bamshad Nazarian, Bård Osdal, Philip Ringrose, Jan-Boye Kristoffersen, Ola Eiken, Hilde Hansen, Snøhvit: The History of Injecting and Storing 1 Mt CO2 in the Fluvial Tubåen Fm Energy Procedia. ,vol. 37, pp. 3565- 3573 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.EGYPRO.2013.06.249
Chen Zhu, Guanru Zhang, Peng Lu, Lifeng Meng, Xiaoyan Ji, Benchmark modeling of the Sleipner CO2 plume: Calibration to seismic data for the uppermost layer and model sensitivity analysis International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. ,vol. 43, pp. 233- 246 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.IJGGC.2014.12.016