The neglect of the environment by cognitive psychology.

作者: Philip T. Dunwoody

DOI: 10.1037/H0091271

关键词: Differential psychologyAttributionPhilosophy of psychologyPerceptual psychologyPsychologySocial cognitionCognitive psychologyFundamental attribution errorHot cognitionEcological validity

摘要: AbstractIn 1955, Egon Brunswik presented a paper in which heargued that neglect of the environment and over empha-sis organism was major downfall cognitivepsychology. His critiques have largely been ignored andresearch is discussed demonstrates same organis-mic-asymmetry detailed 1955. This researchis attribution terms since experimental psy-chologists make behavioral attributions. organismic-asymmetry has resulted body research guiltyof fundamental error. Brunswik’s theoryof representative design, proposed to address organismic-asymmetry, contrasted with calls for eco-logical validity. Although ecological validity arewell intentioned, they lack any systematic theory theenvironment fall significantly short Brunswik’sideal.In Kenneth Hammond paper, “Scopeand aspects cognitive problem,” at one first ever confer-ences on cognition. (2001) writes “in this he[Brunswik] made strong effort whole his life’s workintelligible peers” (p. 298). The theme if not thelanguage, simple; psychology neglected environment. Brun-swik (1957/2001) “if there anything still ails ingeneral, cognition specifically, it ofthe investigation environmental or texture favor thatof organismic structures processes.” Brunswik’sargument carries weight today general, cog-nitive dealt criticisms lev-ied against by 50 years ago.Brunswik began 1955 following sentences, “Oneof broadest most universally accepted definitions psychol-ogy conceives as being concerned interrelation-ships between In definition bothorganism appear equal partners” 300, 1957/

参考文章(40)
Jonathan W. Schooler, Timothy D. Wilson, Thinking too much: introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 60, pp. 181- 192 ,(1991) , 10.1037//0022-3514.60.2.181
Sara D. Hodges, Timothy D. Wilson, Effects of Analyzing Reasons on Attitude Change: The Moderating Role of Attitude Accessibility Social Cognition. ,vol. 11, pp. 353- 366 ,(1993) , 10.1521/SOCO.1993.11.4.353
Gerd Gigerenzer, Ulrich Hoffrage, How to Improve Bayesian Reasoning Without Instruction: Frequency Formats Psychological Review. ,vol. 102, pp. 684- 704 ,(1995) , 10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.684
Glenn R. Shafer, Daniel Kahnerman, Paul Slovic, Amos Tversky, Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Journal of the American Statistical Association. ,vol. 79, pp. 223- ,(1984) , 10.2307/2288362
Apa Centennial, Ellen Berscheid, ATTITUDES AND SOCIAL COGNITION ,(1992)
Karl Haberlandt, Cognitive psychology, 2nd ed. Allyn & Bacon. ,(1997)
R. Carnap, P. Frank, J. Joergensen, C. W. Morris, O. Neurath, L. Rougier, INTERNATIONAL ENCYCLOPEDIA OF UNIFIED SCIENCE. Science. ,vol. 86, pp. 400- 401 ,(1937) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.86.2235.400
Charles S. Carver, Michael F. Scheier, Self and the control of behavior Advances in the study of communication and affect. ,vol. 11, pp. 5- 35 ,(1986) , 10.1007/978-1-4613-1793-7_1
Leonard L. Martin, The Construction of Social Judgments This book grew out of a conference at the University of Georgia in the Spring of 1990.. ,(2013) , 10.4324/9780203772874