Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda

作者: Peter C. Howard , Paolo Viskanic , Tim R. B. Davenport , Fred W. Kigenyi , Michael Baltzer

DOI: 10.1038/28843

关键词: Complementarity (physics)BiodiversityTemperate climateEcologyBiogeographyTropicsGeographySpecies richnessTaxonWoody plant

摘要: A major obstacle to conserving tropical biodiversity is the lack of information as where efforts should be concentrated. One potential solution focus on readily assessed indicator groups, whose distribution predicts overall importance candidate areas1,2. Here we test this idea, using most extensive data set patterns diversity assembled so far for any part tropics. As in studies temperate regions2,3,4,5,6,7,8, found little spatial congruence species richness woody plants, large moths, butterflies, birds and small mammals across 50 Ugandan forests. Despite congruence, sets priority forests selected single taxa only often captured other groups with same efficiency all at once. This because efficient conservation networks incorporate not species-rich sites, but also those biotas best complement areas9,10,11. In Uganda, different exhibit similar biogeography, one taxon collectively represent important forest types well. Our results highlight need, when evaluating indicators reserve selection, consider cross-taxon complementarity well richness.

参考文章(30)
Michael E. Hochberg, Jean Clobert, R. Barbault, Aspects of the genesis and maintenance of biological diversity Oxford University Press. ,(1996)
J. R. Prendergast, S. N. Wood, J. H. Lawton, B. C. Eversham, Correcting for variation in recording effort in analyses of diversity hotspots Biodiversity Letters. ,vol. 1, pp. 39- 53 ,(1993) , 10.2307/2999649
Andrew Balmford, Georgina M. Mace, Joshua R. Ginsberg, Conservation in a Changing World ,(1999)
J. H. Lawton, D. E. Bignell, B. Bolton, G. F. Bloemers, P. Eggleton, P. M. Hammond, M. Hodda, R. D. Holt, T. B. Larsen, N. A. Mawdsley, N. E. Stork, D. S. Srivastava, A. D. Watt, Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest Nature. ,vol. 391, pp. 72- 76 ,(1998) , 10.1038/34166
Curtis H. Flather, Kenneth R. Wilson, Denis J. Dean, William C. McComb, IDENTIFYING GAPS IN CONSERVATION NETWORKS: OF INDICATORS AND UNCERTAINTY IN GEOGRAPHIC-BASED ANALYSES Ecological Applications. ,vol. 7, pp. 531- 542 ,(1997) , 10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0531:IGICNO]2.0.CO;2
Ian Oliver, Andrew J. Beattie, Designing a Cost‐Effective Invertebrate Survey: A Test of Methods for Rapid Assessment of Biodiversity Ecological Applications. ,vol. 6, pp. 594- 607 ,(1996) , 10.2307/2269394
R.L. Pressey, C.J. Humphries, C.R. Margules, R.I. Vane-Wright, P.H. Williams, Beyond opportunism: Key principles for systematic reserve selection Trends in Ecology and Evolution. ,vol. 8, pp. 124- 128 ,(1993) , 10.1016/0169-5347(93)90023-I
Peter Howard, Tim Davenport, Fred Kigenyi, Planning conservation areas in Uganda's natural forests Oryx. ,vol. 31, pp. 253- 264 ,(1997) , 10.1046/J.1365-3008.1997.D01-124.X
M. Kershaw, P. H. Williams, G. M. Mace, Conservation of Afrotropical antelopes: consequences and efficiency of using different site selection methods and diversity criteria Biodiversity and Conservation. ,vol. 3, pp. 354- 372 ,(1994) , 10.1007/BF00056508