THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIAL INTERACTIONS CHANGES PREDICTIONS ABOUT INTERACTING PHENOTYPES

作者: Erem Kazancıoğlu , Hope Klug , Suzanne H. Alonzo

DOI: 10.1111/J.1558-5646.2012.01585.X

关键词: AggressionTraitBiologyTheoretical modelsPoison controlPhenotypeCourtshipEvolutionary biologyExpression (architecture)Genetic model

摘要: In many traits involved in social interactions, such as courtship and aggression, the phenotype is an outcome of interactions between individuals. Such whose expression individual partly determined by its partner are called "interacting phenotypes." Quantitative genetic models suggested that interacting phenotypes can evolve much faster than nonsocial traits. Current models, however, consider interaction partners a fixed phenotypic response rule, represented coefficient (ψ). Here, we extend existing theoretical incorporate trait evolve. We find evolution change qualitatively predictions about rate direction phenotypes. argue it crucial to determine whether how make accurate interactions. Language: en

参考文章(35)
Steven A Frank, None, Foundations of social evolution ,(1998)
A. J. WILSON, M. B. MORRISSEY, M. J. ADAMS, C. A. WALLING, F. E. GUINNESS, J. M. PEMBERTON, T. H. CLUTTON-BROCK, L. E. B. KRUUK, Indirect genetics effects and evolutionary constraint: an analysis of social dominance in red deer, Cervus elaphus Journal of Evolutionary Biology. ,vol. 24, pp. 772- 783 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1420-9101.2010.02212.X
Mathias K�lliker, Ontogeny in the family. Behavior Genetics. ,vol. 35, pp. 7- 18 ,(2005) , 10.1007/S10519-004-0852-9
Joel W. McGlothlin, Allen J. Moore, Jason B. Wolf, Edmund D. Brodie III, INTERACTING PHENOTYPES AND THE EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS. III. SOCIAL EVOLUTION Evolution. ,vol. 64, pp. 2558- 2574 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1558-5646.2010.01012.X
Kai Lindström, Effects of costs and benefits of brood care on filial cannibalism in the sand goby Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. ,vol. 42, pp. 101- 106 ,(1998) , 10.1007/S002650050417
Kai Lindström, Colette M. St. Mary, Christophe Pampoulie, Sexual selection for male parental care in the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. ,vol. 60, pp. 46- 51 ,(2006) , 10.1007/S00265-005-0138-0
Nancy Burley, Sexual Selection for Aesthetic Traits in Species with Biparental Care The American Naturalist. ,vol. 127, pp. 415- 445 ,(1986) , 10.1086/284493
Niclas Kolm, Females produce larger eggs for large males in a paternal mouthbrooding fish Proceedings of The Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. ,vol. 268, pp. 2229- 2234 ,(2001) , 10.1098/RSPB.2001.1792
Reza Azanchi, Ben Smith, Amanda Formosa, Joel D. Levine, Clement Kent, Social context influences chemical communication in D. melanogaster males. Current Biology. ,vol. 18, pp. 1384- 1389 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.CUB.2008.07.088
Kenji Karino, Reiko Arai, Effect of clutch size on male egg-fanning behavior and hatching success in the goby, Eviota prasina (Klunzinger) Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. ,vol. 334, pp. 43- 50 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.JEMBE.2006.01.018