Subtotal versus total abdominal hysterectomy: randomized clinical trial with 14-year questionnaire follow-up.

作者: Lea Laird Andersen , Bent Ottesen , Lars Mikael Alling Møller , Christian Gluud , Ann Tabor

DOI: 10.1016/J.AJOG.2014.12.039

关键词: Randomized controlled trialIntention-to-treat analysisHysterectomySurgeryQuality of lifeMedicineVaginal bleedingConfidence intervalUrinary incontinenceRelative risk

摘要: Objective The objective of the study was to compare long-term results subtotal vs total abdominal hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases 14 years after hysterectomy, with urinary incontinence as primary outcome measure. Study Design This a follow-up multicenter, randomized clinical trial without blinding. Eleven gynecological departments in Denmark contributed participants trial. Women referred who did not have contraindications were (n = 161) 158) hysterectomy. All women enrolled from 1996 2000 still alive and living 304) invited answer validated questionnaire used prior 1 5 year follow-ups. Hospital contacts possibly related postoperatively registered discharge summaries all public hospitals Denmark. analyzed intention treat per protocol. Possible bias caused by missing data handled multiple imputation. was urinary incontinence; secondary outcomes pelvic organ prolapse, constipation, pain, sexuality, quality life (Short Form-36 questionnaire), hospital contacts, vaginal bleeding. Results answered 197 304 (64.8%) (subtotal [n = 97] [63.4%]; 100] [66.2%]). Mean time mean age at 60.1 years. After 32 97 (33%) complained compared 20 100 (20%) (relative risk, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–2.70; P  = .035). imputation analysis, this difference disappeared 1.36; 0.86–2.13; .19). No differences seen any outcomes. Conclusion Subtotal superior on More seem subjective result confirmed analysis should be interpreted cautiously.

参考文章(26)
Ian Milsom, Peter Ekelund, Ulla Molander, Leif Arvidsson, Björn Areskoug, The Influence of Age, Parity, Oral Contraception, Hysterectomy and Menopause on the Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence in Women The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 149, pp. 1459- 1462 ,(1993) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)36415-7
Jakob B. Bjorner, Kate Thunedborg, Tage S. Kristensen, Jens Modvig, Per Bech, The Danish SF-36 Health Survey: Translation and Preliminary Validity Studies Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 51, pp. 991- 999 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00091-2
P Persson, J Brynhildsen, P Kjølhede, , A 1‐year follow up of psychological wellbeing after subtotal and total hysterectomy—a randomised study British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 117, pp. 479- 487 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.2009.02467.X
Chris Sutton, Past, present, and future of hysterectomy. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. ,vol. 17, pp. 421- 435 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.JMIG.2010.03.005
Ranee Thakar, Susan Ayers, Rashmi Srivastava, Isaac Manyonda, Removing the Cervix at Hysterectomy Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 112, pp. 1262- 1269 ,(2008) , 10.1097/AOG.0B013E31818F3BF5
Erin M. Nesbitt-Hawes, Peta E. Maley, Ha Ryun Won, Kenneth S.K. Law, Christine S. Zhang, Stephen D. Lyons, William Ledger, Jason A. Abbott, Laparoscopic Subtotal Hysterectomy: Evidence and Techniques Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. ,vol. 20, pp. 424- 434 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.JMIG.2013.01.009
Jason D. Wright, Thomas J. Herzog, Jennifer Tsui, Cande V. Ananth, Sharyn N. Lewin, Yu-Shiang Lu, Alfred I. Neugut, Dawn L. Hershman, Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 122, pp. 233- 241 ,(2013) , 10.1097/AOG.0B013E318299A6CF
David H. Thom, Stephen K. van den Eeden, Arona I. Ragins, Christina Wassel-Fyr, Eric Vittinghof, Leslee L. Subak, Jeanette S. Brown, Differences in prevalence of urinary incontinence by race/ethnicity. The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 175, pp. 259- 264 ,(2006) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00039-X
Markus Wallwiener, Florin-Andrei Taran, Ralf Rothmund, Adam Kasperkowiak, Gabriel Auwärter, Antje Ganz, Bernhard Kraemer, Harald Abele, Birgitt Schönfisch, Keith B. Isaacson, Sara Yvonne Brucker, Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH): an implementation study in 1,952 patients with an analysis of risk factors for conversion to laparotomy and complications, and of procedure-specific re-operations Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. ,vol. 288, pp. 1329- 1339 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S00404-013-2921-X
Helga Gimbel, Vibeke Zobbe, Bent S. Ottesen, Ann Tabor, Randomized clinical trial of total vs. subtotal hysterectomy: validity of the trial questionnaire. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. ,vol. 81, pp. 968- 974 ,(2002) , 10.1034/J.1600-0412.2002.811012.X