Emergence of cooperation via intention recognition, commitment and apology – A research summary

作者: The Anh Han , Luís Moniz Pereira , Francisco C. Santos , Tom Lenaerts

DOI: 10.3233/AIC-150672

关键词: CollusionPresentationEvolutionary game theoryCognitionEvolutionary psychologyError toleranceComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceVariety (cybernetics)Stability (learning theory)Cognitive psychology

摘要: The mechanisms of emergence and evolution cooperation in populations abstract individuals, with diverse behavioral strategies co-presence, have been undergoing mathematical study via evolutionary game theory, inspired part on psychology. Their systematic resorts to simulation techniques, thus enabling the aforesaid under a variety conditions, parameters alternative virtual games. theoretical experimental results continually surprising, rewarding promising. In our recent work, we initiated introduction, such groups cognitive abilities techniques theories Artificial Intelligence, namely those pertaining Intention Recognition, Commitment Apology (separately jointly), encompassing errors decision-making communication noise. As result, both stability become reinforced comparatively absence abilities. This holds separately for Apology, even more so when they are jointly engaged. Our presentation aims sensitize reader these theory based issues, prospects, which accruing importance modeling minds machines, impact understanding mutual tolerance cooperation. Recognition someone's intentions, may include imagining recognition others own comprise not just some error tolerance, but also penalty unfulfilled commitment though allowing apology, can lead stable win/win equilibriums within perhaps amongst groups. manifestation plus assumption commitment-even whilst paying cost putting it place-and acceptance all facilitators that respect, each them singly and, above all, collusion.

参考文章(66)
The Anh Han, Luís Moniz Pereira, State-of-the-art of intention recognition and its use in decision making Ai Communications. ,vol. 26, pp. 237- 246 ,(2013) , 10.3233/AIC-130559
Oren Etzioni, Neal Brian Lesh, Scalable and adaptive goal recognition University of Washington. ,(1998)
Urs Fischbacher, Verena Utikal, On the acceptance of apologies Games and Economic Behavior. ,vol. 82, pp. 592- 608 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.GEB.2013.09.003
Martin A. Nowak, Karl Sigmund, Tit for tat in heterogeneous populations Nature. ,vol. 355, pp. 250- 253 ,(1992) , 10.1038/355250A0
John R. Searle, The Construction of Social Reality ,(1995)
MichaelE. Bratman, Planning and the stability of intention Minds and Machines. ,vol. 2, pp. 1- 16 ,(1992) , 10.1007/BF00261286
Michael E. Bratman, David J. Israel, Martha E. Pollack, Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoning computational intelligence. ,vol. 4, pp. 349- 355 ,(1988) , 10.1111/J.1467-8640.1988.TB00284.X
Jeng-Yi Tzeng, Toward a more civilized design: studying the effects of computers that apologize International Journal of Human-computer Studies \/ International Journal of Man-machine Studies. ,vol. 61, pp. 319- 345 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.IJHCS.2004.01.002
Han The Anh, Luís Moniz Pereira, Francisco C Santos, Intention recognition promotes the emergence of cooperation Adaptive Behavior. ,vol. 19, pp. 264- 279 ,(2011) , 10.1177/1059712311410896
Eugene Charniak, Robert P. Goldman, A Bayesian model of plan recognition Artificial Intelligence. ,vol. 64, pp. 53- 79 ,(1993) , 10.1016/0004-3702(93)90060-O