Prospective evaluation of anesthetic technique for anorectal surgery.

作者: Thomas E. Read , Scott E. Henry , Robert M. Hovis , James W. Fleshman , Elisa H. Birnbaum

DOI: 10.1007/S10350-004-6466-8

关键词: AnesthesiaAnesthesia Recovery PeriodMedicineSedationAirway managementLithotomy positionAnestheticProne positionSurgerySupine positionLocal anesthesia

摘要: PURPOSE: Deep intravenous sedation plus local anesthesia for anorectal surgery in the prone position is used frequently at our institution, but not widely accepted because of concerns regarding airway management. The purpose this study was to prospectively evaluate safety and efficacy anesthetic technique surgery. METHODS: Data were collected on 413 consecutive patients (mean age, 47 years; mean weight, 80 kg) undergoing surgical procedures. RESULTS: Of 389 who underwent procedures position, 260 (67 percent) received anesthesia, 125 (32 regional (spinal or epidural), 4 (1 general endotracheal anesthesia. 24 lithotomy 13 (54 2 (8 7 (29 mask inhalational Forty-two adverse events attributable occurred 18 patients: nausea vomiting (n = 17), transient hypotension, bradycardia, arrhythmia 8), hypoxia hypoventilation 7), urinary retention 6), severe patient discomfort 2). These complications percent (10/273) receiving 6 (8/127) Two (0.8 rolled supine before completing procedure. Recovery time discharge treated an ambulatory basis significantly shorter those (79 ± 34 minutes, n 174) than (161 63 45; P < 0.001, t-test). CONCLUSION: Intravenous safe effective offers potential cost savings by decreasing recovery room outpatient

参考文章(17)
Capella J, Fleischer M, Marini Cp, Statman R, Shevde K, Local anesthesia is superior to spinal anesthesia for anorectal surgical procedures. American Surgeon. ,vol. 60, pp. 812- 815 ,(1994)
Kratzer Gl, Improved local anesthesia in anorectal surgery. American Surgeon. ,vol. 40, pp. 609- ,(1974)
A. G. N. Schebesta, T. A. W. Wong, A method of spontaneously breathing anaesthesia in the prone position without endotracheal intubation. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. ,vol. 19, pp. 88- 91 ,(1991) , 10.1177/0310057X9101900116
Santhat Nivatvongs, David T. Fang, Harold L. Kennedy, The shape of the buttocks. A useful guide for selection of anesthesia and patient position in anorectal surgery. Diseases of The Colon & Rectum. ,vol. 26, pp. 85- 86 ,(1983) , 10.1007/BF02562578
Shitong Li, Margarita Coloma, Paul F. White, Mehernoor F. Watcha, Jen Wun Chiu, Hong Li, Philip J. Huber, Comparison of the costs and recovery profiles of three anesthetic techniques for ambulatory anorectal surgery. Anesthesiology. ,vol. 93, pp. 1225- 1230 ,(2000) , 10.1097/00000542-200011000-00015
John M. Musgrave, Patrick W. Mazier, Diazepam and local anesthesia in anorectal surgery Diseases of The Colon & Rectum. ,vol. 19, pp. 148- 150 ,(1976) , 10.1007/BF02590869
Randolph H. Bailey, James A. Ferguson, Prevention of urinary retention by fluid restriction following anorectal operations. Diseases of The Colon & Rectum. ,vol. 19, pp. 250- 252 ,(1976) , 10.1007/BF02590913
Richard M. Alexander, Jack W. McElwain, Douglas M. MacLean, Barton Hoexter, Harry J. Powers, Intravenous ketamine hydrochloride and local anesthesia in anorectal surgery. Diseases of The Colon & Rectum. ,vol. 15, pp. 11- 13 ,(1972) , 10.1007/BF02587662
Madhavareddy L. Prasad, Herand Abcarian, Urinary retention following operations for benign anorectal diseases. Diseases of The Colon & Rectum. ,vol. 21, pp. 490- 492 ,(1978) , 10.1007/BF02586733
Marsha M. Cohen, Does Anesthesia Contribute to Operative Mortality? JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. ,vol. 260, pp. 2859- 2863 ,(1988) , 10.1001/JAMA.1988.03410190107032