ACTIONS, BELIEFS, AND CONSEQUENCES

作者: David McCarthy

DOI: 10.1023/A:1004282425643

关键词: HumanitiesJustice (virtue)PhilosophyPhilosophy of languageRegretGenerosityAction (philosophy)MetaphysicsPhilosophy of mind

摘要: L'A. souligne l'incoherence de la doctrine separation des actes et agents du point vue theorie morale. Examinant distinction entre justification permissibilite l'action, d'une part, l'intention croyance l'agent, d'autre l'A. evalue l'idee selon laquelle les personnes qui ont bonnes raisons d'agir ne mesurent pas toujours consequences leurs actes, a lumiere these mort, principe succession, l'argument regret, l'importance risque encourru l'exigence morale

参考文章(7)
John M Taurek, Should the numbers count Philosophy & Public Affairs. ,vol. 6, pp. 293- 316 ,(1977)
Judith Jarvis Thomson, William Parent, Rights, restitution, and risk ,(1986)
Philippa Foot, The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect Oxford Review. ,vol. 5, ,(1967)
Judith Jarvis Thomson, The Realm of Rights ,(1990)
Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State, and Utopia ,(1974)
Robert B. Hallborg,, , The Realm of Rights International Studies in Philosophy. ,vol. 27, pp. 139- 140 ,(1995) , 10.5840/INTSTUDPHIL1995272122
David McCarthy, Rights, Explanation, and Risks Ethics. ,vol. 107, pp. 205- 225 ,(1997) , 10.1086/233718