The nanoeconomics of firm‐level decision‐making and industry evolution: Evidence from 200 years of paper and pulp making

作者: Juha‐Antti Lamberg , Mirva Peltoniemi

DOI: 10.1002/SMJ.3080

关键词: Outcome (game theory)PoliticsProfit marginCorporate governanceControl (management)Industrial organizationNanoeconomicsCompetition (economics)BusinessPolitical risk

摘要: Research Summary We explore the qualitative differences in entries and exits over time. Using quantitative data on 96 firms 200 years, we study industry evolution from perspective of individual decision‐making situations. Our historical statistical analyses reveal vital role technology investments determining firm outcomes, technological, institutional governance dynamics that lead to invest or abstain. main theoretical methodological contribution concerns importance multiplicity firm‐level rationalities decisions as fundamentals theorizing evolution. Managerial What determines outcomes terms acquisition, dissolution, survival? This article answers this crucial question strategy elaborates extent which outcome is under top management control. findings highlight identify factors make such possible profitable. results emphasize weighing options must assess economic meaningfulness generational result narrowing profit margins intensifying competition. Another insight political risks. Long‐term fluctuations regulation foreign trade policy it hazardous optimize contemporary regime. Skillful strategists geographical technological complexity, combination increase chances survival rapidly changing regimes.

参考文章(64)
Joonas Järvinen, Jari Ojala, Anders Melander, Juha-Antti Lamberg, The Evolution of Pulp and Paper Industries in Finland, Sweden, and Norway, 1800–2005 The Evolution of Global Paper Industry 1800¬–2050. pp. 19- 47 ,(2012) , 10.1007/978-94-007-5431-7_2
Steven Klepper, Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle The American Economic Review. ,vol. 86, pp. 562- 583 ,(1996)
Franco Malerba, Luigi Orsenigo, The evolution of the pharmaceutical industry Business History. ,vol. 57, pp. 664- 687 ,(2015) , 10.1080/00076791.2014.975119
Nicholas Argyres, Romel Mostafa, Knowledge Inheritance, Vertical Integration, and Entrant Survival in the Early U.S. Auto Industry Academy of Management Journal. ,vol. 59, pp. 1474- 1492 ,(2016) , 10.5465/AMJ.2013.0180
Mirva Peltoniemi, Reviewing Industry Life-cycle Theory: Avenues for Future Research International Journal of Management Reviews. ,vol. 13, pp. 349- 375 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1468-2370.2010.00295.X
Serguey Braguinsky, David A. Hounshell, History and Nanoeconomics in Strategy and Industry Evolution Research: Lessons from the Meiji‐Era Japanese Cotton Spinning Industry Strategic Management Journal. ,vol. 37, pp. 45- 65 ,(2016) , 10.1002/SMJ.2452
Weiting Zheng, Kulwant Singh, Will Mitchell, Buffering and enabling: The impact of interlocking political ties on firm survival and sales growth Strategic Management Journal. ,vol. 36, pp. 1615- 1636 ,(2015) , 10.1002/SMJ.2301
Hicheon Kim, Robert E. Hoskisson, Laszlo Tihanyi, Jaebum Hong, The Evolution and Restructuring of Diversified Business Groups in Emerging Markets: The Lessons from Chaebols in Korea Asia Pacific Journal of Management. ,vol. 21, pp. 25- 48 ,(2004) , 10.1023/B:APJM.0000024076.86696.D5
Elena Cefis, Orietta Marsili, Survivor: The Role of Innovation in Firms' Survival Research Policy. ,vol. 35, pp. 626- 641 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.RESPOL.2006.02.006