Benchmarking the dental implant evidence on MEDLINE.

作者: Joseph P. Fiorellini , Richard Niederman , Stephen P. Russo , Hans Peter Weber

DOI:

关键词: Clinical knowledgeSubject (documents)Dental implantMedicinePediatricsBenchmarkingMEDLINERelevant informationDentistryEtiology

摘要: The purpose of this study was to estimate the quantity dental implant literature available on MEDLINE for evidence-based clinical decision-making and identify its location. A search strategy based Medical Subject Headings implants developed examine using Ovid Web Gateway engine. Sensitive specific methodologic filters identified 4 categories information: etiology, diagnosis, therapy, prognosis. results were then subdivided by year trends sorted sources publications. searches 4,655 articles published in English between 1989 1999 human MEDLINE. mean number (+/- SD) per ranged from 15 +/- 11 107 50 sensitive searches. increased 14% 43% each search. When category, numbers were, respectively: diagnosis 12 7.5 1.5 1.6, etiology 58 33 1.9 2.5, therapy 23 0.3 0.5, prognosis 67 8.3. Four journals account approximately half these These provide 6 key central findings: (1) there appears be a substantial clinically relevant information upon which base decisions; (2) is significantly biased toward addressing prognosis; (3) stay current, one would need read 1 2 week 52 weeks year, increases year; (4) 50% journals, whereas remainder reside 97 other making it difficult current; (5) reaffirm lifelong learning; (6) also suggest computer-based knowledge systems.

参考文章(13)
R. B. Haynes, N. Wilczynski, K. A. McKibbon, C. J. Walker, J. C. Sinclair, Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound studies in MEDLINE. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. ,vol. 1, pp. 447- 458 ,(1994) , 10.1136/JAMIA.1994.95153434
Trudy Van Der Weijden, C Joris IJzermans, Geert Jan Dinant, Nico P Van Duijn, Riekie De Vet, Frank Buntinx, Identifying relevant diagnostic studies in MEDLINE. The diagnostic value of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and dipstick as an example. Family Practice. ,vol. 14, pp. 204- 208 ,(1997) , 10.1093/FAMPRA/14.3.204
T. Greenhalgh, How to read a paper: The Medline database BMJ. ,vol. 315, pp. 180- 183 ,(1997) , 10.1136/BMJ.315.7101.180
Mark Lutman, Bibliometric analysis as a measure of scientific output. British Journal of Audiology. ,vol. 26, pp. 323- 324 ,(1992) , 10.3109/03005369209076653
Donald A. B. Lindberg, Betsy L. Humphreys, Medicine and Health on the Internet: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly JAMA. ,vol. 280, pp. 1303- 1304 ,(1998) , 10.1001/JAMA.280.15.1303
G. Lewison, M. E. Devey, Bibliometric methods for the evaluation of arthritis research. Rheumatology. ,vol. 38, pp. 13- 20 ,(1999) , 10.1093/RHEUMATOLOGY/38.1.13
C. E. Adams, A. Power, K. Frederick, C. Lefebvre, An investigation of the adequacy of MEDLINE searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the effects of mental health care. Psychological Medicine. ,vol. 24, pp. 741- 748 ,(1994) , 10.1017/S0033291700027896
Sheryl L Follin, Scott L Charland, Acute Pain Management: Operative or Medical Procedures and Trauma: Annals of Pharmacotherapy. ,vol. 31, pp. 1068- 1076 ,(1997) , 10.1177/106002809703100917