Parents of babies who participated in an invasive clinical study report a positive experience: the Glucose in Well Babies (GLOW) study.

作者: Alana R Cumberpatch , Philip J Weston , Jane E Harding , Deborah L Harris

DOI: 10.1136/ARCHDISCHILD-2019-317417

关键词: Normal bloodHome health nursingClinical studyPsychological interventionMedicineFamily medicineClinical researchContinuous glucose monitoringHealth careProspective cohort study

摘要: Objective There is a paucity of data about normal blood metabolite concentrations in healthy babies, part because reluctance to undertake non-therapeutic invasive testing newborns. The Glucose Well Babies study (GLOW) sought describe glucose, lactate and beta-hydroxybutyrate term babies over the first 5 postnatal days. We also understand both parents’ experience participation this study. Design, setting, patients interventions Eligible were healthy, term, appropriately grown singletons born birthing centre, hospital or home within greater Hamilton area then discharged home. had subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring placed soon after birth, up 14 heel-prick samples, twice-daily visits parents asked record all feeds. At completion, independently complete questionnaire their experience. Results All eligible completed every parent (65 fathers, 66 mothers). Parents reported they liked contributing improving healthcare (126/131, 96%) support from GLOW team (119/131, 91%). Nearly (127/131, 97%) would participate again if another baby, recommend family friends. Two-thirds (87/131, 66%) that made them more likely contribute clinical research future. Conclusions Non-therapeutic studies involving procedures are feasible, positive

参考文章(16)
Jeffrey P. Burns, Research in children Critical Care Medicine. ,vol. 31, pp. S131- S136 ,(2003) , 10.1097/01.CCM.0000054905.39382.58
William W. Hay, Tonse NK. Raju, Rosemary D. Higgins, Satish C. Kalhan, Sherin U. Devaskar, Knowledge gaps and research needs for understanding and treating neonatal hypoglycemia: workshop report from Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. The Journal of Pediatrics. ,vol. 155, pp. 612- 617 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.JPEDS.2009.06.044
J M Hawdon, M P Ward Platt, A Aynsley-Green, Patterns of metabolic adaptation for preterm and term infants in the first neonatal week. Archives of Disease in Childhood. ,vol. 67, pp. 357- 365 ,(1992) , 10.1136/ADC.67.4_SPEC_NO.357
Liv Fegran, Sølvi Helseth, May Solveig Fagermoen, A comparison of mothers’ and fathers’ experiences of the attachment process in a neonatal intensive care unit Journal of Clinical Nursing. ,vol. 17, pp. 810- 816 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1365-2702.2007.02125.X
L McKechnie, Consent for neonatal research. Archives of Disease in Childhood-fetal and Neonatal Edition. ,vol. 91, ,(2006) , 10.1136/ADC.2005.075036
Colin J Morley, Rosalind Lau, Peter G Davis, C Morse, What do parents think about enrolling their premature babies in several research studies Archives of Disease in Childhood-fetal and Neonatal Edition. ,vol. 90, ,(2005) , 10.1136/ADC.2004.061986
D L Harris, P J Weston, J E Harding, Mothers of babies enrolled in a randomized trial immediately after birth report a positive experience. Journal of Perinatology. ,vol. 34, pp. 280- 283 ,(2014) , 10.1038/JP.2013.183
Jonathan M. Davis, Edward M. Connor, Alastair J. J. Wood, The need for rigorous evidence on medication use in preterm infants: is it time for a neonatal rule? JAMA. ,vol. 308, pp. 1435- 1436 ,(2012) , 10.1001/JAMA.2012.12883
David Wendler, Leah Belsky, Kimberly M. Thompson, Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Quantifying the Federal Minimal Risk Standard JAMA. ,vol. 294, pp. 826- 832 ,(2005) , 10.1001/JAMA.294.7.826