Determination and localized analysis of intersatellite line of sight gravity difference: Results from the GRAIL primary mission

作者: Shin‐Chan Han

DOI: 10.1002/2013JE004402

关键词: AccelerationGravity (chemistry)Coherence (signal processing)GeodesyOrbit (dynamics)TrajectorySpectral densityGeophysicsGeologyLine-of-sightNoise (radio)

摘要: [1] The line of sight (LOS) gravity difference between two coorbiting spacecrafts is determined in terms intersatellite range-acceleration measurements available from the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL). The precise orbit data are crucial for retrieving range acceleration aligning LOS particularly altitude. A relative error a few centimeters position tens µm/s velocity commensurate with GRAIL-ranging instrument noise at μGal difference. power spectrum, as well topography correlation admittance, quantified by upward continuing topographic potential, forward modeling along spacecraft trajectory (i.e., Bouguer correction) comparing GRAIL observations. Based on analysis primary mission, I found that observation produced near unity potential out to degree 550, higher than global estimate, over areas covered low-altitude (~20 km). crustal density was estimated be 2500–2600 kg/m3 regional variations about 10%, minimizing coherence band 150–300. Systematic decrease estimates 3–4% or 100 observed shorter wavelengths (degree 300–500). It implies inadequacy uniform model across entire lithosphere suggests radial stratification bulk (or porosity). Due spatially localized characteristic, suited highest-possible resolution.

参考文章(40)
Christopher Jekeli, THE DETERMINATION OF GRAVITATIONAL POTENTIAL DIFFERENCES FROM SATELLITE-TO-SATELLITE TRACKING Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy. ,vol. 75, pp. 85- 101 ,(1999) , 10.1023/A:1008313405488
David E. Smith, Maria T. Zuber, Gregory A. Neumann, Frank G. Lemoine, Erwan Mazarico, Mark H. Torrence, Jan F. McGarry, David D. Rowlands, James W. Head, Thomas H. Duxbury, Oded Aharonson, Paul G. Lucey, Mark S. Robinson, Olivier S. Barnouin, John F. Cavanaugh, Xiaoli Sun, Peter Liiva, Dan-dan Mao, James C. Smith, Arlin E. Bartels, Initial observations from the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA) Geophysical Research Letters. ,vol. 37, ,(2010) , 10.1029/2010GL043751
B. D. Tapley, S. Bettadpur, M. Watkins, C. Reigber, The gravity recovery and climate experiment: Mission overview and early results Geophysical Research Letters. ,vol. 31, ,(2004) , 10.1029/2004GL019920
Alex S. Konopliv, Ryan S. Park, Dah-Ning Yuan, Sami W. Asmar, Michael M. Watkins, James G. Williams, Eugene Fahnestock, Gerhard Kruizinga, Meegyeong Paik, Dmitry Strekalov, Nate Harvey, David E. Smith, Maria T. Zuber, The JPL lunar gravity field to spherical harmonic degree 660 from the GRAIL Primary Mission Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. ,vol. 118, pp. 1415- 1434 ,(2013) , 10.1002/JGRE.20097
Torsten Mayer-Gürr, Annette Eicker, Karl Heinz Ilk, Gravity Field Recovery from GRACE-SST Data of Short Arcs Observation of the Earth System from Space. pp. 131- 148 ,(2006) , 10.1007/3-540-29522-4_10
M. Beuthe, S. Le Maistre, P. Rosenblatt, M. Pätzold, V. Dehant, Density and lithospheric thickness of the Tharsis Province from MEX MaRS and MRO gravity data Journal of Geophysical Research. ,vol. 117, ,(2012) , 10.1029/2011JE003976
Frank G. Lemoine, Sander Goossens, Terence J. Sabaka, Joseph B. Nicholas, Erwan Mazarico, David D. Rowlands, Bryant D. Loomis, Douglas S. Chinn, Douglas S. Caprette, Gregory A. Neumann, David E. Smith, Maria T. Zuber, High‒degree gravity models from GRAIL primary mission data Journal of Geophysical Research. ,vol. 118, pp. 1676- 1698 ,(2013) , 10.1002/JGRE.20118
Milo Wolff, Direct measurements of the Earth's gravitational potential using a satellite pair Journal of Geophysical Research. ,vol. 74, pp. 5295- 5300 ,(1969) , 10.1029/JB074I022P05295