Skill Automaticity in Mathematics Instruction: A Response to Gagne

作者: Ipke Wachsmuth

DOI:

关键词: Context (language use)AutomaticityEducation theoryCognitionSet (psychology)Teaching methodLearning theoryMathematics instructionPsychologyMathematics education

摘要: In his remarks on "Some Issues in the Psychology of Mathematics Instruction," Gagne (1983) has stimulated a renewed discussion cognitive phenomena involved when children learn mathematics and implications learning theory for instruction. gives three-phase performance model along with following core message: Students should understand how to mathematize concrete situation that is described verbally validate solution once it obtained, but they need not derived. Instead, skills computation phase be made automatic sake optimal overall performance, lots practice devoted automatizing such skills. Taken out their context inserted into current climate education, Gagne's statements are likely misunderstood, giving wrong impression teachers perhaps causing researchers reject ideas. The purpose this critique make more careful inquiry proposals and, at same time, set skill automaticity

参考文章(4)
Edward J. Davis, Suggestions for Teaching the Basic Facts of Arithmetic. NCTM Yearbook. ,(1978)
Robert M. Gagné, Robert M. Gagne, Some Issues in the Psychology of Mathematics Instruction Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. ,vol. 14, pp. 7- 18 ,(1983) , 10.2307/748793
Lauren B. Resnick, Wendy W. Ford, Psychology of Mathematics for Instruction ,(1981)
John Robert Anderson, Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications ,(2014)