A randomized controlled trial to prevent glycemic relapse in longitudinal diabetes care: Study protocol (NCT00362193)

作者: Mary Margaret Huizinga , Ayumi Shintani , Stephanie Michon , Anne Brown , Kathleen Wolff

DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-24

关键词: GlycemicReferralRelapse preventionHealth services researchNursingType 2 diabetesMedicineClinical endpointIntensive care medicineRandomized controlled trialGlycated hemoglobin

摘要: Background: Diabetes is a common disease with self-management key aspect of care. Large prospective trials have shown that maintaining glycated hemoglobin less than 7% greatly reduces complications but translating this level control into everyday clinical practice can be difficult. Intensive improvement programs are successful in attaining patients type 2 diabetes, however, many experience glycemic relapse once returned to routine This early is, part, due decreased adherence behaviors. Objective: paper describes the design Glycemic Relapse Prevention study. The purpose study determine optimal frequency maintenance intervention needed prevent relapse. primary endpoint relapse, which defined as greater 8% and an increase 1% from baseline. Methods: consists telephonic contact by nurse practitioner referral dietitian if indicated. was designed provide identification self-care problems, understanding rationale behind lapse problem solve find negotiated solution. A total 164 were randomized care (least intensive), phone every three months (moderate intensity) or month (most intensive).

参考文章(41)
William R. Miller, Stephen Rollnick, Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change. Guilford Press. ,(2002)
Diabetes Control and Complications Trial, None, Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 353, pp. 2643- 2653 ,(2005) , 10.1056/NEJMOA052187
Kuei-Shen Tu, Gretchen McDaniel, Janice Templeton Gay, Diabetes self-care knowledge, behaviors, and metabolic control of older adults--the effect of a posteducational follow-up program. The Diabetes Educator. ,vol. 19, pp. 25- 30 ,(1993) , 10.1177/014572179301900105
Robert C Turner, Carole A Cull, Valeria Frighi, Rury R Holman, UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group, UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group, None, Glycemic Control With Diet, Sulfonylurea, Metformin, or Insulin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes MellitusProgressive Requirement for Multiple Therapies (UKPDS 49) JAMA. ,vol. 281, pp. 2005- 2012 ,(1999) , 10.1001/JAMA.281.21.2005
S. J. Kenny, P. J. Smith, M. G. Goldschmid, J. M. Newman, W. H. Herman, Survey of physician practice behaviors related to diabetes mellitus in the U.S. Physician adherence to consensus recommendations. Diabetes Care. ,vol. 16, pp. 1507- 1510 ,(1993) , 10.2337/DIACARE.16.11.1507
T. A. Elasy, A. L. Graber, K. Wolff, A. Brown, A. Shintani, Glycemic relapse after an intensive outpatient intervention for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. ,vol. 26, pp. 1645- 1646 ,(2003) , 10.2337/DIACARE.26.5.1645
Sheila H. Roman, Maureen I. Harris, Management of diabetes mellitus from a public health perspective Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America. ,vol. 26, pp. 443- 474 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0889-8529(05)70260-7
A. L. Graber, P. Davidson, A. W. Brown, J. R. McRae, K. Woolridge, Dropout and Relapse During Diabetes Care Diabetes Care. ,vol. 15, pp. 1477- 1483 ,(1992) , 10.2337/DIACARE.15.11.1477
Joseph G. Baum, Hewitt B. Clark, Jack Sandler, Preventing relapse in obesity through posttreatment maintenance systems: comparing the relative efficacy of two levels of therapist support. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. ,vol. 14, pp. 287- 302 ,(1991) , 10.1007/BF00845456