Can Teachers' Images of Good Writing Conflict with Goals of Process Writing?.

作者: Sarah J. McCarthey

DOI:

关键词: Structure (mathematical logic)Mathematics educationWriting instructionPsychologyPedagogyProcess (engineering)Selection (linguistics)Bureaucracy

摘要: Process writing approaches have been described in the literature for well over ten years (e.g., Atwell, 1987; Calkins, 1983, 1986, 1991; Graves, 1983; Murray, 1979). Features of process usually include: (a) authentic purposes and real audience, (b) student selection topic, (c) multiple drafts with revision emphasized, (d) within a predictable structure which teachers students devote time to talking about writing. Despite careful delineation these features, questions remain how effectively implemented (Applebee, 1986). The difficulties implementing change classroom norms bureaucratic institutions documented (Florio-Ruane, Lensmire, Michaels, 1987).

参考文章(15)
Donald M. Murray, The Listening Eye: Reflections on the Writing Conference. College English. ,vol. 41, pp. 13- 18 ,(1979) , 10.4324/9781410603968-24
Frederick Erickson, Robert Linn, Qualitative methods in research on teaching ,(1985)
Lucy McCormick Calkins, The art of teaching writing ,(1985)
Lucy McCormick Calkins, Shelley Harwayne, Living between the lines ,(1990)
Donald H. Graves, Writing Teachers and Children At Work ,(1983)
Polly Ulichny, Karen Ann Watson‐Gegeo, Interactions and authority: The dominant interpretive framework in writing conferences Discourse Processes. ,vol. 12, pp. 309- 328 ,(1989) , 10.1080/01638538909544733
Sarah Michaels, Text and context: A new approach to the study of classroom writing Discourse Processes. ,vol. 10, pp. 321- 346 ,(1987) , 10.1080/01638538709544681
Edward Twitchell Hall, The Hidden Dimension ,(1966)