Protection of the environment from ionising radiation in a regulatory context--an overview of the PROTECT coordinated action project.

作者: B J Howard , N A Beresford , P Andersson , J E Brown , D Copplestone

DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/30/2/S01

关键词: Risk perceptionRisk analysis (engineering)Computer scienceAction (philosophy)Environmental exposureRadiation monitoringContext (language use)Radiation protectionEnvironmental pollutionImpact assessment

摘要: The outcome of the PROTECT project (Protection Environment from Ionising Radiation in a Regulatory Context) is summarised, focusing on protection goal and derivation dose rates which may detrimentally affect wildlife populations. To carry out an impact assessment for radioactive substances, estimated produced by tools need to be compared with some form criteria judge level risk. do this, appropriate goals defined associated predefined rate values, or benchmarks, derived agreed upon. Previous approaches used estimate at there observable changes populations individuals are described discussed, as more recent derivations screening benchmarks use regulatory frameworks. We have adopted guidance procedures regulation other chemical stressors derive benchmarks. On basis consultation many relevant experts, has benchmark rate, using data largely reproductive effects species sensitivity distributions, 10 µGy h − 1 can identify situations below concern high degree confidence.

参考文章(36)
C. H. Clement, Environmental protection : the concept and use of reference animals and plants Published for the International Commission on Radiological Protection by Elsevier. ,(2009)
J. Valentin, Analysis of the criteria used by the International Commission on Radiological Protection to justify the setting of numerical protection level values Published for the International Commission on Radiological Protection by Elsevier. ,(2007)
Anne Steenhout, Inge Mangelsdorf, Peter Calow, Hannu Komulainen, Ole Ladefoged, Jan Linders, Matti Viluksela, Marco Vighi, Wolfgang Dekant, Marco Nuti, Bo Jansson, Helmut Greim, Hanke Wojciech, Colin Janssen, Jose Tarazona, Herman Autrup, Emanuela Testai, Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks opinion on: The revised chapter for Human Health Risk Characterisation of the Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment in support of Directive 93/67/EEC on new notified substances and Regulation 1488/94 on existing substances of new and existing substances (Draft of November 2005) Members ot the Working Group of SCHER by alph Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks. ,(2006)
C. Cailles, N. A. Beresford, D. Copplestone, K. Beaugelin-Seiller, A. Hosseini, J. E. Brown, C. L. Barnett, Evaluation of approaches for protecting the environment from ionising radiation in a regulatory context NERC/Centre for Ecology & Hydrology. ,(2008)
G. Failla, R.M. Sievert, RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION Health Physics (England). ,(1959)
J. D. Stark, J. E. Banks, R. Vargas, How risky is risk assessment: The role that life history strategies play in susceptibility of species to stress Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 101, pp. 732- 736 ,(2004) , 10.1073/PNAS.0304903101
D. Copplestone, J. Hingston, A. Real, The development and purpose of the FREDERICA radiation effects database Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. ,vol. 99, pp. 1456- 1463 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.JENVRAD.2008.01.006
J. Garnier-Laplace, D. Copplestone, R. Gilbin, F. Alonzo, P. Ciffroy, M. Gilek, A. Agüero, M. Björk, D.H. Oughton, A. Jaworska, C.M. Larsson, J.L. Hingston, Issues and practices in the use of effects data from FREDERICA in the ERICA Integrated Approach Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. ,vol. 99, pp. 1474- 1483 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.JENVRAD.2008.04.012
K. Beaugelin-Seiller, J. Garnier-Laplace, J. C. Gariel, F. Jasserand, E.D.E.N.: A tool for the estimation of dose coefficients for non-human biota Radioprotection. ,vol. 40, ,(2005) , 10.1051/RADIOPRO:2005S1-135