Forskning i kvalitet eller kvalitativ forskning

作者: SVEN MØRCH

DOI: 10.1080/00291463.1989.10636973

关键词: Social scienceQualitative researchQualitative analysisPsychologyEpistemologyArgumentQuality (business)Social changeIntentionalityFocus (linguistics)

摘要: March, S. (1989). Research in quality or qualitative research? Nordisk Psykologi, 41, 204–221. The discussion of the research methods is a never ending story. In this article analysis discussed and considered according to its critical intentions. This opens some questions about quantitative vs. methods, points actual attempt argue for as an acceptable »scientific« method. focuses on phenomenological development method, shortcomings understanding social phenomenons invididual intentionality. My argument that human activity part societal change must be focus discussion.

参考文章(7)
D. Kivinen, A. Kihlström, A. Eskola, Blind Alleys in Social Psychology: A Search for Ways Out ,(1988)
SVEN MØRCH, Samfund og psykologi Nordisk Psykologi. ,vol. 40, pp. 296- 308 ,(1988) , 10.1080/00291463.1988.10636935
ANTTI ESKOLA, Människobilden förändras, men förändras vår metodologi? Nordisk Psykologi. ,vol. 40, pp. 325- 331 ,(1988) , 10.1080/00291463.1988.10636937
Steinar Kvale, The Qualitative Research Interview Journal of Phenomenological Psychology. ,vol. 14, pp. 171- 196 ,(1983) , 10.1163/156916283X00090
PER SCHULTZ JØRGENSEN, Om kvalitative analyser—og deres gyldighed Nordisk Psykologi. ,vol. 41, pp. 25- 41 ,(1989) , 10.1080/00291463.1989.10636953
R. Michael Garavito, Daniel Picot, The art of crystallizing membrane proteins Methods. ,vol. 1, pp. 57- 69 ,(1990) , 10.1016/S1046-2023(05)80147-1
Charles Wright Mills, The Sociological Imagination ,(1959)