Peptide enrichment by microfluidic electrocapture for online analysis by electrospray mass spectrometry.

作者: Susanne Vollmer , Juan Astorga-Wells , Gunvor Alvelius , Tomas Bergman , Hans Jörnvall

DOI: 10.1016/J.AB.2007.09.017

关键词: Electrospray ionizationDetection limitProtein mass spectrometryChemical bindingChromatographyExtractive electrospray ionizationChemistryMass spectrometrySample preparation in mass spectrometryElectrospray

摘要: Identification of peptides from a complex mixture can be difficult because the wide concentration range and different ionization efficiencies during analysis by electrospray (ESI) mass spectrometry (MS). Preconcentration methods are necessary to allow low-abundance low-intensity reach threshold spectrometer. Here we demonstrate peptide enrichment based on electroimmobilization. Peptides immobilized without use solid support or chemical binding application an electric field along microflow stream in electrocapture cell. Once enriched/preconcentrated inside cell, they released removal via interface with emitter submitted online spectrometric analysis. Tandem containing hemoglobin, myoglobin, bovine serum albumin (BSA), cytochrome c was successful. Amplification factors up 16-fold were achieved improvement signal-to-noise values for preconcentrated sample. The limit detection one 3.6 fmol.

参考文章(37)
Nan Zhang, Nan Li, Liang Li, None, Liquid Chromatography MALDI MS/MS for Membrane Proteome Analysis Journal of Proteome Research. ,vol. 3, pp. 719- 727 ,(2004) , 10.1021/PR034116G
Kevin K Anderson, Matthew E Monroe, Don S Daly, Estimating probabilities of peptide database identifications to LC-FTICR-MS observations Proteome Science. ,vol. 4, pp. 1- 7 ,(2006) , 10.1186/1477-5956-4-1
Garry L. Corthals, Valerie C. Wasinger, Denis F. Hochstrasser, Jean-Charles Sanchez, The dynamic range of protein expression: a challenge for proteomic research. Electrophoresis. ,vol. 21, pp. 1104- 1115 ,(2000) , 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(20000401)21:6<1104::AID-ELPS1104>3.0.CO;2-C
Sergio L. S. Freire, Aaron R. Wheeler, Proteome-on-a-chip: mirage, or on the horizon? Lab on a Chip. ,vol. 6, pp. 1415- 1423 ,(2006) , 10.1039/B609871A
Hongfeng Yin, Kevin Killeen, Reid Brennen, Dan Sobek, Mark Werlich, Tom van de Goor, Microfluidic Chip for Peptide Analysis with an Integrated HPLC Column, Sample Enrichment Column, and Nanoelectrospray Tip Analytical Chemistry. ,vol. 77, pp. 527- 533 ,(2005) , 10.1021/AC049068D
Daniel P. Kirby, Jacqueline M. Thorne, Wolfgang K. Götzinger, Barry L. Karger, A CE/ESI-MS interface for stable, low-flow operation Analytical Chemistry. ,vol. 68, pp. 4451- 4457 ,(1996) , 10.1021/AC960598M
Bernhard H. Weigl, Ron L. Bardell, Catherine R. Cabrera, Lab-on-a-chip for drug development. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. ,vol. 55, pp. 349- 377 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0169-409X(02)00223-5
Richard D. Smith, Jose A. Olivares, Nhung T. Nguyen, Harold R. Udseth, Capillary zone electrophoresis-mass spectrometry using an electrospray ionization interface Analytical Chemistry. ,vol. 60, pp. 436- 441 ,(1988) , 10.1021/AC00156A013
Niels Lion, Frédéric Reymond, Hubert H Girault, Joël S Rossier, Why the move to microfluidics for protein analysis Current Opinion in Biotechnology. ,vol. 15, pp. 31- 37 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.COPBIO.2004.01.001