A Review of the Psychometric Properties of Generic Utility Measures in Multiple Sclerosis

作者: Ayse Kuspinar , Nancy E. Mayo

DOI: 10.1007/S40273-014-0167-5

关键词: ValidityPsychometricsScale (social sciences)Data miningConvergent validityClinical psychologyHealth Utilities IndexReliability (statistics)Content validityQuality-adjusted life yearMedicine

摘要: The reliability and validity of generic utility measures have not yet been summarized in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). It is important to assess the psychometric properties these measures, ensure that values obtained by scoring system are valid for interpretation utilization clinicians, researchers policy makers. Therefore, objective this review was summarize evidence from published literature on MS. A structured search conducted using electronic databases. All potentially relevant abstracts full-text articles were read identify publications may be eligible inclusion review. meta-analysis combine correlation coefficient convergent validity. Schmidt–Hunter method, a weighted mean values, used. Heterogeneity, percentage total variation across studies due between-study differences rather than chance, assessed I 2 statistic. following identified: EQ-5D (n = 9)/EQ-5D-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) (n = 1), followed Health Utilities Index Mark 3/2 (HUI2/HUI3) (n = 3), SF-6D (n = 2), Assessment Quality Life (AQOL) Well-Being (QWB) scale (n = 1). Ceiling floor effects present SF-6D, but HUI3. EQ-5D, HUI3 demonstrated excellent reliability. In terms discriminative ability, QWB able differentiate between moderately severely disabled MS patients, those who mildly disabled. AQOL HUI3, other hand, good as both all levels disability. As validity, HUI2/HUI3 highly correlated (r = 0.7) against measurement instruments evaluated impairments such disease severity, ambulation manual dexterity. small moderate correlations (r = 0.4) evaluating impairments, slightly stronger activity limitations/participation restrictions health-related quality life (HRQL) (r = 0.6). To our knowledge first study strongest when compared measures. However, only impairment excludes components HRQL participation restrictions. scale, do include items participation. lack content missing certain domains disease, well difficulty differentiating different addition MS-specific ‘bolt-ons’ development an specific measure possible areas exploration future research.

参考文章(57)
Martina Garau, Koonal K. Shah, Anne R. Mason, Qing Wang, Adrian Towse, Michael F. Drummond, Using QALYs in cancer: a review of the methodological limitations. PharmacoEconomics. ,vol. 29, pp. 673- 685 ,(2011) , 10.2165/11588250-000000000-00000
Graeme Hawthorne, Jeff Richardson, Richard Osborne, The Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument: a psychometric measure of Health-Related Quality of Life Quality of Life Research. ,vol. 8, pp. 209- 224 ,(1999) , 10.1023/A:1008815005736
Harri Sintonen, Markku Pekurinen, A fifteen-dimensional measure of health-related quality of life (15D) and its applications Quality of Life Assessment: Key Issues in the 1990s. pp. 185- 195 ,(1993) , 10.1007/978-94-011-2988-6_9
L.B. Mokkink, D.L. Knol, C.B. Terwee, H.C.W. de Vet, Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide ,(2011)
David Feeny, William Furlong, Michael Boyle, George W. Torrance, Multi-attribute health status classification systems. Health Utilities Index. PharmacoEconomics. ,vol. 7, pp. 490- 502 ,(1995) , 10.2165/00019053-199507060-00004
Stephen Polgar, Shane A. Thomas, Introduction to Research in the Health Sciences ,(1991)
M. F. Janssen, E. I. Lubetkin, J. P. Sekhobo, A. S. Pickard, The use of the EQ-5D preference-based health status measure in adults with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetic Medicine. ,vol. 28, pp. 395- 413 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1464-5491.2010.03136.X
D T Grima, G W Torrance, G Francis, G Rice, A J Rosner, L Lafortune, Cost and health related quality of life consequences of multiple sclerosis Multiple Sclerosis Journal. ,vol. 6, pp. 91- 98 ,(2000) , 10.1177/135245850000600207
Jeff Richardson, Angelo Iezzi, Munir A. Khan, Aimee Maxwell, Validity and Reliability of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-8D Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. ,vol. 7, pp. 85- 96 ,(2014) , 10.1007/S40271-013-0036-X