Nitrogen balance in response to dryland crop rotations and cultural practices

作者: Upendra M. Sainju , Andrew W. Lenssen , Brett L. Allen , William B. Stevens , Jalal D. Jabro

DOI: 10.1016/J.AGEE.2016.08.023

关键词: Environmental scienceAgroecosystemNitrogen balanceCropLeaching (agriculture)Crop rotationCropping systemDenitrificationMonocroppingAgronomy

摘要: Abstract Nitrogen balance provides a measure of agroecosystem performance and environmental sustainability by taking into accounts N inputs outputs retention in the soil. The objective this study was to evaluate based on soil sequestration after 7 yr response five dryland crop rotations (two 4-yr stacked two alternate-year one monocropping) cultural practices arranged split-plot design northern Great Plains, USA. Stacked were durum ( Triticum turgidum L.)-durum-canola Brassica napus L.)-pea Pisum sativum L.) (D-D-C-P) durum-durum-flax Linum usitatissimum (D-D-F-P). Alternate-year durum-canola-durum-pea (D-C-D-P) durum-flax-durum-pea (D-F-D-P). Monocroppping continuous (CD). Cultural traditional (conventional till, recommended seed rate, broadcast fertilization, reduced stubble height) ecological (no-till, increased banded height). Total annual input due pea fixation, atmospheric deposition, N, nonsymbiotic fixation lower CD than other rotations, regardless practices. output grain removal losses denitrification, volatilization, plant senescence, leaching, gaseous (NO x ) emissions, surface runoff D-F-D-P D-C-D-P D-C-D-P, D-D-C-P, D-F-D-P. rate at 0–125 cm from 2005 2011 ranged 40 kg N ha −1  yr for D-D-F-P 52 kg N ha CD. −39 −36 kg N ha with compared 9–25 kg N ha both Because reliance external removal, flow, surplus, legumes, nonlegumes, oilseed crops rotation can be productive environmentally sustainable monocropping,

参考文章(38)
Ramon C Littell, Walter W. Stroup, George A. Milliken, Russell D. Wolfinger, Oliver Schabenberger, SAS for Mixed Models ,(2018)
Virginia Nichols, Nele Verhulst, Rachael Cox, Bram Govaerts, Weed dynamics and conservation agriculture principles: A review Field Crops Research. ,vol. 183, pp. 56- 68 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.FCR.2015.07.012
J. J. Meisinger, G. W. Randall, Estimating Nitrogen Budgets for Soil-Crop Systems Managing Nitrogen for Groundwater Quality and Farm Profitability. pp. 85- 124 ,(2015) , 10.2136/1991.MANAGINGNITROGEN.C5
L. E. Drinkwater, P. Wagoner, M. Sarrantonio, Legume-based cropping systems have reduced carbon and nitrogen losses Nature. ,vol. 396, pp. 262- 265 ,(1998) , 10.1038/24376
H.H. Janzen, K.A. Beauchemin, Y. Bruinsma, C.A. Campbell, R.L. Desjardins, B.H. Ellert, E.G. Smith, The fate of nitrogen in agroecosystems: An illustration using Canadian estimates Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. ,vol. 67, pp. 85- 102 ,(2003) , 10.1023/A:1025195826663
M. Herrero, P. K. Thornton, A. M. Notenbaert, S. Wood, S. Msangi, H. A. Freeman, D. Bossio, J. Dixon, M. Peters, J. van de Steeg, J. Lynam, P. P. Rao, S. Macmillan, B. Gerard, J. McDermott, C. Sere, M. Rosegrant, Smart investments in sustainable food production: revisiting mixed crop-livestock systems. Science. ,vol. 327, pp. 822- 825 ,(2010) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1183725
Upendra M. Sainju, Andrew W. Lenssen, Thecan Caesar-TonThat, Jalal D. Jabro, Robert T. Lartey, Robert G. Evans, Brett L. Allen, Dryland soil nitrogen cycling influenced by tillage, crop rotation, and cultural practice Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. ,vol. 93, pp. 309- 322 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S10705-012-9518-9
James A. Staricka, Blaine G. Schatz, Brian G. McConkey, George W. Clayton, Perry R. Miller, Stewart A. Brandt, Karnes E. Neill, David D. Baltensperger, Guy P. Lafond, Adrian M. Johnston, Pulse Crop Adaptation in the Northern Great Plains Agronomy Journal. ,vol. 94, pp. 261- 272 ,(2002) , 10.2134/AGRONJ2002.2610