Work health and safety and the criminal law in Australia

作者: Richard Johnstone

DOI: 10.1080/14774003.2013.11667788

关键词: LegislationWork (electrical)LawStatuteCulpabilitySanctionsPolitical scienceGross negligenceOccupational safety and healthCriminal law

摘要: This paper analyses recent Australian debates about the use of criminal law in work health and safety regulation. It argues that these have to be seen context historical development regulation United Kingdom Australia. The first part shows that, since late 19th century, contraventions against statutes not been regarded as 'really criminal', largely addressed by informal measures and, 1980s, administrative sanctions. When prosecutions taken place, issues individualised decontextualised, so defendants able reduce their culpability eyes court. Significant legal barriers undermined crime gross negligence manslaughter corporations individuals. second restructuring bolstering 'criminality' offences under statutes. latter debate has constrained forces examined paper, current position, embodied recently harmonised Work Health Safety Acts, favours attempting recriminalise legislation. reforming stalled.

参考文章(4)
Michael Tooma, Richard Johnstone, Work health and safety regulation in Australia: the Model Act Faculty of Law; Australian Centre for Health Law Research; School of Law. ,(2012)
Kit Carson, Richard Johnstone, The Dupes of Hazard: Occupational Health and Safety and the Victorian Sanctions Debate Journal of Sociology. ,vol. 26, pp. 126- 141 ,(1990) , 10.1177/144078339002600107
Richard Johnstone, Michelle King, ‘A Responsive Sanction to Promote Systematic Compliance?: Enforceable Undertakings in Occupational Health and Safety Regulation’ Faculty of Law; Australian Centre for Health Law Research; School of Law. ,vol. 21, pp. 280- 315 ,(2008)