The Influence of Spatial Resolution on Nonlinear Force-Free Modeling

作者: M. L. DeRosa , M. S. Wheatland , K. D. Leka , G. Barnes , T. Amari

DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/811/2/107

关键词: Magnetic helicityMagnetogramBoundary (topology)PhysicsField lineHelmholtz decompositionField (physics)Coronal loopAstrophysicsImage resolution

摘要: The nonlinear force-free field (NLFFF) model is often used to describe the solar coronal magnetic field, however a series of earlier studies revealed difficulties in numerical solution application photospheric boundary data. We investigate sensitivity modeling spatial resolution data, by applying multiple codes that numerically solve NLFFF sequence vector magnetogram data at different resolutions, prepared from single Hinode/SOT-SP scan NOAA Active Region 10978 on 2007 December 13. analyze resulting energies and relative helicities, employ Helmholtz decomposition characterize divergence errors, quantify changes made order be compatible with model. This study shows results depend quantitatively input using more highly resolved yields self-consistent results. free solutions generally trend higher increasing resolution, while helicity values vary significantly between resolutions for all methods. All methods require changing horizontal components, some also vertical excess nominal uncertainties produced various are each level. continue recommend verifying agreement modeled lines corresponding loop images before any scientific setting.

参考文章(60)
Ramesh Menon, Robit Chandra, Dave Kohr, Jeff McDonald, Dror Maydan, Leonardo Dagum, Parallel Programming in OpenMP ,(2000)
Thomas R. Metcalf, Litao Jiao, Alexander N. McClymont, Richard C. Canfield, Han Uitenbroek, Is the solar chromospheric magnetic field force-free? The Astrophysical Journal. ,vol. 439, pp. 474- 481 ,(1995) , 10.1086/175188
G. Valori, P. Démoulin, E. Pariat, S. Masson, Accuracy of magnetic energy computations Astronomy and Astrophysics. ,vol. 553, ,(2013) , 10.1051/0004-6361/201220982
K. D. Leka, Graham Barnes, A. D. Crouch, Thomas R. Metcalf, G. Allen Gary, Ju Jing, Y. Liu, Resolving the 180° Ambiguity in Solar Vector Magnetic Field Data: Evaluating the Effects of Noise, Spatial Resolution, and Method Assumptions Solar Physics. ,vol. 260, pp. 83- 108 ,(2009) , 10.1007/S11207-009-9440-8
E. N. Parker, Inferring Mean Electric Currents in Unresolved Fibril Magnetic Fields The Astrophysical Journal. ,vol. 471, pp. 485- 488 ,(1996) , 10.1086/177983
T. Amari, T. Z. Boulmezaoud, J. J. Aly, Well posed reconstruction of the solar coronal magnetic field Astronomy and Astrophysics. ,vol. 446, pp. 691- 705 ,(2006) , 10.1051/0004-6361:20054076
K. D. Leka, Michael J. Turmon, Sebastien Couvidat, Xudong Sun, Rebecca Centeno, Keiji Hayashi, Aimee Norton, J. Todd Hoeksema, Graham Barnes, Yang Liu, Monica Bobra, Jesper Schou, Jesper Schou, The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) Vector Magnetic Field Pipeline: Overview and Performance Solar Physics. ,vol. 289, pp. 3483- 3530 ,(2014) , 10.1007/S11207-014-0516-8
T. Wiegelmann, B. Inhester, T. Sakurai, PREPROCESSING OF VECTOR MAGNETOGRAPH DATA FOR A NONLINEAR FORCE-FREE MAGNETIC FIELD RECONSTRUCTION Solar Physics. ,vol. 233, pp. 215- 232 ,(2006) , 10.1007/S11207-006-2092-Z
G. Valori, L. M. Green, P. Démoulin, S. Vargas Domínguez, L. van Driel-Gesztelyi, A. Wallace, D. Baker, M. Fuhrmann, Nonlinear force-free extrapolation of emerging flux with a global twist and serpentine fine structures Solar Physics. ,vol. 278, pp. 73- 97 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S11207-011-9865-8