Is Karenia brevis really a low-light-adapted species?

作者: Charles L. Tilney , Sugandha Shankar , Katherine A. Hubbard , Alina A. Corcoran

DOI: 10.1016/J.HAL.2019.101709

关键词: PhotosynthesisKarenia brevisDinoflagellateBottom waterPopulationBloomOceanographyShoreBiologyPhytoplankton

摘要: Abstract Despite nearly annual blooms of the neurotoxic dinoflagellate Karenia brevis (Davis) G. Hansen and Moestrup in Gulf Mexico, defining suite biological traits that explain its proliferation has remained challenging. Studies have described K. as a low-light-adapted species, incapable sustaining growth under high light, which is at odds with observed surface aggregations sometimes within centimeters sea also short-term experiments showing photosynthetic machinery accommodating irradiances. Here, photophysiology three isolates were evaluated range environmentally relevant irradiances (10–1500 μmol photons m−2 s−1) laboratory. No differences growth–irradiance curves among isolates; all sustained maximum rates highest examined, even exposures long weeks. The efficiency α light-limiting conditions appeared mediocre dinoflagellates, poorer than other phytoplankton (e.g., diatoms, cyanobacteria), implying not low-light specialist. This finding substantially alters earlier parameterizations curves. Therefore, model was developed to contextualize how these new might affect bottom rates. subsequently applied case study comparing seasonal light forcing offshore Pinellas County, FL, USA, single empirical value for attenuation, water temperatures. Predictions suggested may limit close 1 km from shore winter, but would only begin limiting 20 km summer. Population maintenance (no net growth) possible far 90 km summer 68 km winter. These ranges intercept areas thought be important bloom initiation.

参考文章(90)
Anthony W. D. Larkum, Light-Harvesting Systems in Algae Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 277- 304 ,(2003) , 10.1007/978-94-007-1038-2_13
Jeff Cosgrove, Michael A. Borowitzka, Chlorophyll fluorescence terminology: An introduction Cosgrove, J. <https://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/view/author/Cosgrove, Jeffrey.html> and Borowitzka, M.A. <https://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/view/author/Borowitzka, Michael.html>ORCID: 0000-0001-6504-4563 <http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6504-4563> (2010) Chlorophyll fluorescence terminology: An introduction. In: Suggett, D.J., Prášil, O. and Borowitzka, M.A., (eds.) Chlorophyll a Fluorescence in Aquatic Sciences: Methods and Applications. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 1-17.. pp. 1- 17 ,(2010) , 10.1007/978-90-481-9268-7_1
Michael J. Behrenfeld, Ondrej Prasil, Zbigniew S. Kolber, Marcel Babin, Paul G. Falkowski, Compensatory changes in Photosystem II electron turnover rates protect photosynthesis from photoinhibition Photosynthesis Research. ,vol. 58, pp. 259- 268 ,(1998) , 10.1023/A:1006138630573
Joel G. Kingsolver, The Well‐Temperatured Biologist The American Naturalist. ,vol. 174, pp. 755- 768 ,(2009) , 10.1086/648310
PER JUEL HANSEN, The role of photosynthesis and food uptake for the growth of marine mixotrophic dinoflagellates. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. ,vol. 58, pp. 203- 214 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1550-7408.2011.00537.X
D. V. Aldrich, Photoautotrophy in Gymnodinium breve Davis Science. ,vol. 137, pp. 988- 990 ,(1962) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.137.3534.988
Oscar Schofield, John Kerfoot, Kevin Mahoney, Mark Moline, Matthew Oliver, Steven Lohrenz, Gary Kirkpatrick, Vertical migration of the toxic dinoflagellate Karenia brevis and the impact on ocean optical properties Journal of Geophysical Research. ,vol. 111, ,(2006) , 10.1029/2005JC003115
D. L. Eng-Wilmot, W. S. Hitchcock, D. F. Martin, Effect of temperature on the proliferation of Gymnodinium breve and Gomphosphaeria aponina Marine Biology. ,vol. 41, pp. 71- 77 ,(1977) , 10.1007/BF00390583