The impact of non-invasive prenatal testing on anxiety in women considered at high or low risk for aneuploidy after combined first trimester screening.
作者： Zara Richmond , Ron Fleischer , Maya Chopra , Jason Pinner , Mario D'Souza
DOI: 10.1002/PD.5110
关键词: First trimester 、 Non invasive 、 Aneuploidy 、 Anxiety 、 Gynecology 、 Obstetrics 、 Medicine 、 Blood draw
摘要: Objective The aim of this study was to (1) examine the psychological impact non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in women with a high-risk (≥1:300) and low-risk (≤1:301) result on combined First Trimester Screening (cFTS); (2) factors influencing anxiety decision-making both risk populations. Method Questionnaires structured interviews were administered low (n = 50) high =63) at time NIPT blood draw (point A) again least one week after receiving their B). Anxiety levels measured these two points using State-Trait Inventory (STAI). Results Both cFTS groups demonstrated similar intrinsic (trait) (36+10 vs. 35+10; p=0.70). High had significantly higher state point A than (42+11 36+11; p<0.01). Both statistically significant reduction (p<0.01), final B (30+11 29+8; P=0.61). Conclusion Women have counterparts. Following result, populations are reduced levels.
sci-hub.se 参考文章(21)
L Hui, EE Muggli, JL Halliday, Population-based trends in prenatal screening and diagnosis for aneuploidy: a retrospective analysis of 38 years of state-wide data. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 123, pp. 90- 97 ,(2016) , 10.1111/1471-0528.13488
Jan M. M. Van Lith, Brigitte H. W. Faas, Diana W. Bianchi, Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 1: NIPT for chromosome abnormalities should be offered to women with low a priori risk Prenatal Diagnosis. ,vol. 35, pp. 8- 14 ,(2015) , 10.1002/PD.4530
Lisa Hui, Stephanie The, Elizabeth A. McCarthy, Susan P. Walker, Emerging issues in invasive prenatal diagnosis: Safety and competency in the post-NIPT era Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. ,vol. 55, pp. 541- 546 ,(2015) , 10.1111/AJO.12396
Sandra Nakić Radoš, Vesna Košec, Vesna Gall, The psychological effects of prenatal diagnostic procedures: maternal anxiety before and after invasive and noninvasive procedures Prenatal Diagnosis. ,vol. 33, pp. 1194- 1200 ,(2013) , 10.1002/PD.4223
Lisa Hui, Jon Hyett, Noninvasive prenatal testing for trisomy 21: Challenges for implementation in Australia Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 53, pp. n/a- n/a ,(2013) , 10.1111/AJO.12117
Mary E. Norton, Herb Brar, Jonathan Weiss, Ardeshir Karimi, Louise C. Laurent, Aaron B. Caughey, M. Hellen Rodriguez, John Williams, Michael E. Mitchell, Charles D. Adair, Hanmin Lee, Bo Jacobsson, Mark W. Tomlinson, Dick Oepkes, Desiree Hollemon, Andrew B. Sparks, Arnold Oliphant, Ken Song, Non-Invasive Chromosomal Evaluation (NICE) Study: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study for detection of fetal trisomy 21 and trisomy 18 American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 207, pp. 137- ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.AJOG.2012.05.021
Kerry-Ann Grant, Catherine McMahon, Marie-Paule Austin, Maternal anxiety during the transition to parenthood: a prospective study. Journal of Affective Disorders. ,vol. 108, pp. 101- 111 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.JAD.2007.10.002
Melissa Hill, Jane Fisher, Lyn S. Chitty, Stephen Morris, Women’s and health professionals’ preferences for prenatal tests for Down syndrome: a discrete choice experiment to contrast noninvasive prenatal diagnosis with current invasive tests Genetics in Medicine. ,vol. 14, pp. 905- 913 ,(2012) , 10.1038/GIM.2012.68
P. Benn, H. Cuckle, E. Pergament, Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome: the paradigm will shift, but slowly. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 39, pp. 127- 130 ,(2012) , 10.1002/UOG.11083
Ken Song, Thomas J. Musci, Aaron B. Caughey, Clinical utility and cost of non-invasive prenatal testing with cfDNA analysis in high-risk women based on a US population Journal of Maternal-fetal & Neonatal Medicine. ,vol. 26, pp. 1180- 1185 ,(2013) , 10.3109/14767058.2013.770464