Global Emission Ceiling Versus International Cap and Trade: What is the Most Efficient System to Solve the Climate Change Issue?

作者: Jacqueline Morgan , Fabien Prieur

DOI: 10.1007/S10666-013-9361-7

关键词: Mathematical economicsNash equilibriumEconomicsStochastic gameControl (management)Emissions tradingConstraint (mathematics)Quadratic equationInformation and Communications TechnologyVariational inequality

摘要: We model the climate change issue as a pollution control game with purpose of comparing two possible departures from business usual (BAU) where countries noncooperatively choose their emission levels. In first scenario, players have to agree on global cap (GEC) that is enforced by uniform taxation scheme. They still behave strategically when choosing levels but are now subject coupled constraint imposed cap. The second scenario consists implementation an international and trade (ICT) system. this case, decide quotas, trading allowed. A three heterogenous player quadratic serves basis for analysis. When binding, among all constraints Nash equilibria, we select particular normalized equilibrium solving variational inequality. Comparing equilibria BAU ICT, show if appropriately chosen, then GEC system improves players’ payoffs, relative BAU. may thus be unanimously approved whereas ICT not, because moving costly one player. Second, some values cap, get higher payoff under than ICT. Therefore, outperforms both in terms feasibility efficiency.

参考文章(32)
Jacek B. Krawczyk, Stanislav Uryasev, Relaxation algorithms to find Nash equilibria with economic applications Environmental Modeling & Assessment. ,vol. 5, pp. 63- 73 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1019097208499
David Martimort, Wilfried Sand-Zantman, A Mechanism Design Approach to Climate Agreements Research Papers in Economics. ,(2011)
Laurent Drouet, Alain Haurie, Jean-Philippe Vial, Marc Vielle, A Game of International Climate Policy Solved by a Homogeneous Oracle-Based Method for Variational Inequalities Advances in Dynamic Games. ,vol. 11, pp. 469- 488 ,(2011) , 10.1007/978-0-8176-8089-3_23
Tatsuro Ichiishi, Game theory for economic analysis ,(1983)
A. Jacquemin, Claude d'Aspremont-Lynden, Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly With Spillovers The American Economic Review. ,vol. 78, pp. 1133- 1137 ,(1988)
Anna von Heusinger, Christian Kanzow, Optimization reformulations of the generalized Nash equilibrium problem using Nikaido-Isoda-type functions Computational Optimization and Applications. ,vol. 43, pp. 353- 377 ,(2009) , 10.1007/S10589-007-9145-6
J. B. Rosen, Existence and uniqueness of equilibrium points for concave n-person games Econometrica. ,vol. 33, pp. 251- 251 ,(1965) , 10.2307/1911749
Francisco Facchinei, Christian Kanzow, Generalized Nash Equilibrium Problems Annals of Operations Research. ,vol. 175, pp. 177- 211 ,(2010) , 10.1007/S10479-009-0653-X