Cost-effectiveness analysis of diagnosis and management of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions.

作者: Scott B Cantor , Michele Follen Mitchell , Guillermo Tortolero-Luna , Charlotte S Bratka , Diane C Bodurka

DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00623-6

关键词: RadiologyHospital chargeColposcopyEpidermoid carcinomaBiopsyCost-effectiveness analysisPapanicolaou stainEndoscopyMedicineSurgeryCohort

摘要: Abstract Objective: To compare five strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs), including those that incorporate colposcopy a new technology, fluorescence spectroscopy. Methods: On basis health care perspective, we performed cost-effectiveness analysis using decision-analytic model management SILs. We compared based on expected costs number cases were treated appropriately, missed, inappropriately, appropriately not in hypothetical cohort 100 patients referred after an abnormal Papanicolaou smear. Data prevalence operating characteristics derived from medical literature. Costs adjusted hospital charge data. Results: A see-and-treat strategy spectroscopy was least expensive but effective strategy, costing $160,479 to detect 31.55 precancer accurately patients. The most colposcopically directed biopsy, at $311,808 find 45.78 cases; however, when both tests used modality, slightly more found (46.05) lower cost ($285,133). Other dominated base case. incremental joint with spectroscopy-only $8596 per case detected. Sensitivity showed sensitive technology Conclusion: Fluorescence should be considered important innovation SILs as demonstrated by its efficacy economic advantages.

参考文章(22)
Barry L. Hainer, Daron Gale Ferris, John L. Pfenninger, Thomas J. Zuber, 'See and treat' electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone. Journal of Family Practice. ,vol. 42, pp. 253- 257 ,(1996)
David Haber, Guide to clinical preventive services: a challenge to physician resourcefulness Clinical Gerontologist. ,vol. 12, pp. 17- 29 ,(1993) , 10.1300/J018V12N03_03
G. Javaheri, Moshe D. Fejgin, Diagnostic value of colposcopy in the investigation of cervical neoplasia American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 137, pp. 588- 594 ,(1980) , 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90701-2
Milton C. Weinstein, Clinical Decision Analysis ,(1980)
P CRISTOFORONI, D GERBALDO, A PERINO, R PICCOLI, F MONTZ, G CAPITANIO, Computerized colposcopy: results of a pilot study and analysis of its clinical relevance. Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 85, pp. 1011- 1016 ,(1995) , 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00051-R
STEVEN A. FINKLER, The Distinction Between Cost and Charges Annals of Internal Medicine. ,vol. 96, pp. 102- 109 ,(1982) , 10.7326/0003-4819-96-1-102
J Mason, M Drummond, G Torrance, Some guidelines on the use of cost effectiveness league tables. BMJ. ,vol. 306, pp. 570- 572 ,(1993) , 10.1136/BMJ.306.6877.570
R. J. Kurman, Interim guidelines for management of abnormal cervical cytology. The 1992 National Cancer Institute Workshop JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. ,vol. 271, pp. 1866- 1869 ,(1994) , 10.1001/JAMA.271.23.1866
P NIEMINEN, M KALLIO, M HAKAMA, The effect of mass screening on incidence and mortality of squamous and adenocarcinoma of cervix uteri Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 85, pp. 1017- 1021 ,(1995) , 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00063-W
Robert J Kurman, Donald E Henson, Arthur L Herbst, Kenneth L Noller, Mark H Schiffman, Thomas Bonfiglio, Henry Buck, Christopher Crum, John P Curtin, Mitchell Greenberg, Kenneth Hatch, Donald Earl Henson, A Bennett Jenson, Peter Johnson, Howard Jones, Harold Kaminetsky, Luella Klein, Leopold Koss, Burton Krumholz, Nancy Lee, Ronald Luff, Jeanne Mandelblatt, Richard Reid, Ralph Richart, Thomas Sedlacek, Charles Sneiderman, Diane Solomon, Mark Stoler, Floyd Taub, Edward Trimble, Ernest Tucker, Leo B Twiggs, Edward Wilkinson, Barbara Atkinson, Harvey E Averette, William Creasman, Sandra Fryhofer, Julie Noy, Mary Nielsen, Kenneth Noller, Robert Park, Douglas Westhoff, Interim Guidelines for Management of Abnormal Cervical Cytology JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. ,vol. 271, pp. 1866- 1869 ,(1994) , 10.1001/JAMA.1994.03510470070037