Adaptive management and targeting of agri-environment schemes does benefit biodiversity: a case study of the corn bunting Emberiza calandra

作者: Allan J. Perkins , Hywel E. Maggs , Adam Watson , Jeremy D. Wilson

DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-2664.2011.01958.X

关键词: AgricultureEmberizaPopulation growthEcologyEmberizidaeBiodiversityGeographyAdaptive managementAgricultural sciencePopulationCorn bunting

摘要: Summary 1. Agri-environment schemes (AES) are the main European policy response to biodiversity loss caused by agricultural intensification. Maximizing their effectiveness is a key challenge. Monitoring essential inform adaptation and improvement of over time, understand how measures may need vary across species’ range. 2. We measured changes in breeding abundance severely declining bird, corn bunting Emberiza calandra, AES Scotland 7 years 71 farms. Two were monitored, one with general management for farmland birds, targeted, adaptive buntings. We use these data estimate proportion population that must influence halt overall decline. 3. Corn buntings increased 5·6% per annum on farms targeted AES, showed no significant change declined 14·5% outside AES. 4. In arable-dominated areas, food availability reversed declines. However, where high nested grasslands, an additional option delayed mowing was achieving increase. 5. Results suggest approximately 72% mainland receive current decline. In 2009, only 24% this way. 6. Synthesis applications. capable reversing declines Scotland, same likely benefit wide range other taxa too, but require geographical targeting flexibility adapt improve options, backed expert advice. Targeted provision required level will cost £120 000 annum, 500–600 ha under appropriate management. This 0·02% annual subsidies paid Scottish farmers, 0·5% land remaining bunting. These outcomes illustrate value monitoring studies assess scheme effectiveness, identify improvements, determine scale implementation species

参考文章(40)
Allan J. Perkins, Hywel E. Maggs, Jeremy D. Wilson, Adam Watson, Chris Smout, Targeted management intervention reduces rate of population decline of Corn BuntingsEmberiza calandrain eastern Scotland Bird Study. ,vol. 55, pp. 52- 58 ,(2008) , 10.1080/00063650809461504
Ramon C. Littell, SAS System for Mixed Models ,(1996)
P. V. Grice, A. D. Evans, J. D. Wilson, Bird Conservation and Agriculture ,(2009)
C. CARVELL, W. R. MEEK, R. F. PYWELL, D. GOULSON, M. NOWAKOWSKI, Comparing the efficacy of agri‐environment schemes to enhance bumble bee abundance and diversity on arable field margins Journal of Applied Ecology. ,vol. 44, pp. 29- 40 ,(2006) , 10.1111/J.1365-2664.2006.01249.X
JEREMY D. WILSON, ANDREW D. EVANS, PHILIP V. GRICE, Bird conservation and agriculture: a pivotal moment? Ibis. ,vol. 152, pp. 176- 179 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1474-919X.2009.00992.X
Tobias Roth, Valentin Amrhein, Beatrice Peter, Darius Weber, A Swiss agri-environment scheme effectively enhances species richness for some taxa over time Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. ,vol. 125, pp. 167- 172 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.AGEE.2007.12.012
Catherine Davey, Juliet Vickery, Nigel Boatman, Dan Chamberlain, Hazel Parry, Gavin Siriwardena, None, Regional variation in the efficacy of Entry Level Stewardship in England Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. ,vol. 139, pp. 121- 128 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.AGEE.2010.07.008
Ruth D Swetnam, J Owen Mountford, Sarah J Manchester, Richard K Broughton, Agri-environmental schemes: their role in reversing floral decline in the Brue floodplain, Somerset, UK. Journal of Environmental Management. ,vol. 71, pp. 79- 93 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2004.01.006
Danaë K. Stevens, Richard B. Bradbury, Effects of the Arable Stewardship Pilot Scheme on breeding birds at field and farm-scales Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. ,vol. 112, pp. 283- 290 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.AGEE.2005.07.008