When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize

作者: Jonathan Haidt , Jesse Graham

DOI: 10.1007/S11211-007-0034-Z

关键词: SociologySystem justificationSocial dominance orientationMoral foundations theoryMoralityEnvironmental ethicsMoral psychologyHarmReciprocity (social psychology)Economic Justice

摘要: Researchers in moral psychology and social justice have agreed that morality is about matters of harm, rights, justice. On this definition morality, conservative opposition to programs appears be immoral, has been explained as a product various non-moral processes such system justification or dominance orientation. In article we argue that, from an anthropological perspective, the domain usually much broader, encompassing many more aspects life valuing institutions than individuals. We present theoretical empirical reasons for believing there are five psychological systems provide foundations worlds moralities. The preparations detecting reacting emotionally issues related harm/care, fairness/reciprocity, ingroup/loyalty, authority/respect, purity/sanctity. Political liberals intuitions primarily based upon first two foundations, therefore misunderstand motivations political conservatives, who generally rely all foundations.

参考文章(37)
Pope Benedict Xvi, Introduction to Christianity ,(1968)
Richard Erskine Frere Leakey, The Origin Of Humankind ,(1982)
Paul M. Sniderman, Thomas Leonard Piazza, The scar of race ,(1993)
Roy F. Baumeister, Evil : inside human cruelty and violence W.H. Freeman. ,(1997)
Paul Rozin, Jonathan Haidt, Clark R. McCauley, Disgust: The Body and Soul Emotion John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 429- 445 ,(2005) , 10.1002/0470013494.CH21
Christopher Boehm, Hierarchy in the forest : the evolution of egalitarian behavior Harvard University Press. ,(2009) , 10.2307/J.CTVJF9XR4
Richard A. Shweder, Manamohan Mahapatra, Joan G. Miller, Culture and moral development. Cambridge University Press. pp. 130- 204 ,(1990) , 10.1017/CBO9781139173728.005