作者: Jonathan Haidt , Jesse Graham
DOI: 10.1007/S11211-007-0034-Z
关键词: Sociology 、 System justification 、 Social dominance orientation 、 Moral foundations theory 、 Morality 、 Environmental ethics 、 Moral psychology 、 Harm 、 Reciprocity (social psychology) 、 Economic Justice
摘要: Researchers in moral psychology and social justice have agreed that morality is about matters of harm, rights, justice. On this definition morality, conservative opposition to programs appears be immoral, has been explained as a product various non-moral processes such system justification or dominance orientation. In article we argue that, from an anthropological perspective, the domain usually much broader, encompassing many more aspects life valuing institutions than individuals. We present theoretical empirical reasons for believing there are five psychological systems provide foundations worlds moralities. The preparations detecting reacting emotionally issues related harm/care, fairness/reciprocity, ingroup/loyalty, authority/respect, purity/sanctity. Political liberals intuitions primarily based upon first two foundations, therefore misunderstand motivations political conservatives, who generally rely all foundations.